38 Distinctive Properties of Speech Motor Control

Language has a dualistic structure: a meaning level formed by morphemes, words and syntactic rules, and a sound level, at which concatenations of a limited number of basic sounds (segments, phonemes) are used to form the lexical items of our mental dictionary. This dualistic structure constrains speech motor control theories. They must account for: 1. effects of segmental context on movements for a given segment, and; 2. semantic, syntactic and lexical effects, such as semantic focus, signalled by sentence stress, intonation, syntactic boundary effects, signalled by segment duration, and lexical stress effects. Additional constraints arise from nonlinguistic factors such as variations of speaking style and speaking rate, ‘compression’ effects of utterance size on segment duration and the great ability of the production mechanism to adapt to postural variations, either self imposed or experimenter imposed. Consideration of these constraints plus speech errors suggests a tripartite structure to the speech production process consisting of 1. establishment of semantic and syntactic structure and choice of lexical items, 2. serial arrangement of a set of segments in short term store, and 3. implementation of motor control algorithms responding to segmental specification and current linguistic and nonlinguistic constraints. Theoretical approaches to speech motor control have consisted primarily of unsatisfactory attempts to use the concepts of spatial or auditory target, a spring analogy, and the concept of coordinative structure to account for the maintainence of invariance in segment production. The main general hypothesis pertaining to control of segment durations–that there is a mechanism tending to produce equal intervals between stressed syllables in English (Stress Timing) is also unsatisfactory.

[1]  George D. Allen,et al.  Speech Rhythm: Its Relation to Performance Universals and Articulatory Timing. , 1975 .

[2]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[3]  K. Pike,et al.  The intonation of American English , 1946 .

[4]  B.E.F. Lindblom,et al.  Some Temporal Regularities of Spoken Swedish , 1975 .

[5]  K. Moll,et al.  A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities , 1976 .

[6]  A.W.F. Huggins,et al.  On Isochrony and Syntax , 1975 .

[7]  P. MacNeilage,et al.  CHAPTER TWELVE – Central Processes Controlling Speech Production during Sleep and Waking , 1973 .

[8]  I. Lehiste chapter 7 – Suprasegmental Features of Speech , 1976 .

[9]  Roger S. Brown,et al.  The "Tip of the Tongue" Phenomenon , 1966 .

[10]  T J Hixon,et al.  Dynamics of the chest wall during speech production: function of the thorax, rib cage, diaphragm, and abdomen. , 1976, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  A. Benguerel,et al.  Coarticulation of Upper Lip Protrusion in French , 1974, Phonetica.

[12]  P. MacNeilage Motor control of serial ordering of speech. , 1970, Psychological review.

[13]  L. A. Chistovich,et al.  Speech: articulation and perception , 1965 .

[14]  D. Klatt Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Coarticulation in recent speech production models , 1977 .

[16]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances , 1971 .

[17]  James Lubker,et al.  Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation , 1979 .

[18]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Durational patterns of Swedish phonology : do they reflect short-term motor memory processes? , 1981 .

[19]  D. K. Oller,et al.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  J H Abbs,et al.  Lip and jaw motor control during speech: responses to resistive loading of the jaw. , 1975, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  C. J. Riordan,et al.  Control of vocal-tract length in speech. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Ohala mathematical model of speech aerodynamics , 1974, Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics University of Copenhagen.