Interface response-based soil classification framework

Current soil classification systems based on cone penetration testing (CPT) utilize a combination of the tip resistance (qt), pore pressure (u2), and friction sleeve (fs) measurements as inputs. While the qt measurements are typically normalized by the overburden stress, the fs measurements are often normalized by the net tip resistance, leading to the use of parameters that are dependent on each other. This paper presents the development of a soil classification framework that utilizes a normalized multi-friction parameter (MFP) and the CPT normalized tip resistance. The MFP parameter is obtained from measurements with textured friction sleeves from soundings with multi-sleeve attachments. The use of textured friction sleeves allows for fundamental differences in soil–structure interface behavior and particle sizes to be captured due to the significant degree of shearing induced within the soil. This classification framework was developed with results from over 30 soundings at six different sites. The analysis of samples taken from the field indicates that the proposed framework provides a classification that better agrees with the grain-size distribution for residuum, calcareous and intermediate soils, as compared to existing CPT-based systems. The potential development of a simplified probe with just one additional friction sleeve sensor can provide appropriate classification results and would facilitate adoption for use in practice.

[1]  J. D. Frost,et al.  The influence of surface roughness form on the strength of sand–structure interfaces , 2017 .

[2]  J. David Frost,et al.  Experimental Study of Shear Zones Formed at Sand/Steel Interfaces in Axial and Torsional Axisymmetric Tests , 2015 .

[3]  M. Randolph,et al.  Comparing CPTU Q – F and Q – Δ u 2 /σ v0 ′soil classification charts , 2012 .

[4]  Richard J. Jardine,et al.  Large-displacement interface shear between steel and granular media , 2011 .

[5]  P. Robertson Interpretation of cone penetration tests — a unified approach , 2009 .

[6]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Analysis of Factors Influencing Soil Classification Using Normalized Piezocone Tip Resistance and Pore Pressure Parameters , 2008 .

[7]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  In Situ Assessment of Role of Surface Roughness on Interface Response , 2005 .

[8]  W. M. Camp,et al.  Drilled and Driven Foundation Behavior in a Calcareous Clay , 2004 .

[9]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  A Multisleeve Friction Attachment for the Cone Penetrometer , 2002 .

[10]  Jason T. DeJong,et al.  Investigation of particulate-continuum interface mechanisms and their assessment through a multi-friction sleeve penetrometer attachment , 2001 .

[11]  J. Santamarina,et al.  Soils and waves:Particulate materials behavior, characterization and process monitoring , 2001 .

[12]  Rodrigo Salgado,et al.  SHEAR STRENGTH AND STIFFNESS OF SILTY SAND , 2000 .

[13]  Mm Allam,et al.  INTERFACIAL FRICTION BETWEEN SANDS AND SOLID SURFACES. , 1998 .

[14]  P. Robertson Soil classification using the cone penetration test , 1990 .

[15]  J. D. Murff,et al.  Pile Capacity in Calcareous Sands: State if the Art , 1987 .

[16]  Hideaki Kishida,et al.  Frictional Resistance at Yield between Dry Sand and Mild Steel , 1986 .

[17]  H. Kishida,et al.  INFLUENTIAL FACTORS OF FRICTION BETWEEN STEEL AND DRY SANDS , 1986 .

[18]  M. Jefferies,et al.  Use of CPTu to Estimate Equivalent SPT N60 , 1993 .