Efficacy of Papacarie® in reduction of residual bacteria in deciduous teeth: a randomized, controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to analyze the efficacy of Papacarie® gel compared with the traditional method (low-speed bur) in reducing the counts of total bacteria, Lactobacillus, total Streptococcus and Streptococcus mutans group. METHODS: A randomized, controlled clinical trial with a split-mouth design was performed. The sample comprised 40 deciduous teeth in 20 children (10 males and 10 females) aged four to seven years. The teeth were randomly allocated to two groups: G1, or chemomechanical caries removal with Papacarie Duo®, and G2, or the removal of carious dentin tissue with a low-speed bur. Infected dentin was collected prior to the procedure, and the remaining dentin was collected immediately following the removal of the carious tissue. Initial and final counts of bacterial colonies were performed to determine whether there was a reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) of each microorganism studied. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01811420. RESULTS: Reductions were found in the numbers of total bacteria, total Streptococcus and Streptococcus mutans group following either of the caries removal methods (p<0.05). A reduction was also noted in the number of Lactobacillus CFUs; however, this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Papacarie® is an excellent option for the minimally invasive removal of carious tissue, achieving significant reductions in total bacteria, total Streptococcus and S. mutans with the same effectiveness as the traditional caries removal method.

[1]  M. El-Tekeya,et al.  Effectiveness of 2 chemomechanical caries removal methods on residual bacteria in dentin of primary teeth. , 2012, Pediatric dentistry.

[2]  J. Saavedra,et al.  La práctica restaurativa atraumática: una alternativa dental bien recibida por los niños , 2012 .

[3]  C. França,et al.  [Atraumatic restorative treatment: a dental alternative well-received by children]. , 2012, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[4]  N. Gugnani,et al.  An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: a comparitive clinical study. , 2011, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[5]  R. Somani,et al.  Comparative clinical evaluation of chemomechanical caries removal agent Papacarie® with conventional method among rural population in India: in vivo study , 2011 .

[6]  S. Bussadori,et al.  Clinical and radiographic study of chemical-mechanical removal of caries using Papacárie: 24-month follow up. , 2011, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[7]  K. Sirkar,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie) and conventional method of caries removal: an in vitro study. , 2010, Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.

[8]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review , 2010, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[9]  M. Martins,et al.  Biocompatibility analysis of chemomechanical caries removal material Papacárie on cultured fibroblasts and subcutaneous tissue. , 2009, Journal of dentistry for children.

[10]  M. Martins,et al.  Aesthetic restoration of deciduous anterior teeth after removal of carious tissue with Papacárie. , 2009, Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research.

[11]  S. Bussadori,et al.  Chemo-mechanical removal of caries in an adolescent patient using a papain gel: case report. , 2008, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[12]  S. Bussadori,et al.  Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. , 2005, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[13]  I. Balčiūnienė,et al.  Chemomechanical caries removal for children. , 2005, Stomatologija.

[14]  Y. Wint,et al.  Antibacterial effects of Carica papaya fruit on common wound organisms. , 2003, The West Indian medical journal.

[15]  P. Cleaton-jones,et al.  Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in carious dentine before and after Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  P. Cleaton-jones,et al.  Mutans streptococci strains prevalence before and after cavity preparation during Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. , 2003, Oral microbiology and immunology.

[17]  J. van Houte,et al.  A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. , 1973, Archives of oral biology.

[18]  M. Rogosa,et al.  A Selective Medium for the Isolation and Enumeration of Oral Lactobacilli , 1951, Journal of dental research.