The importance of the cortical subarachnoid space in understanding hydrocephalus.

OBJECT In this paper the authors define the role of the cortical subarachnoid space (CSAS) in poorly understood forms of hydrocephalus to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics to improve understanding of the importance of the CSAS and its role in selecting patients for endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). The secondary purpose of this work was to define testable hypotheses to explain enigmatic disorders of CSF dynamics and to suggest how these concepts could be tested. METHODS The magnitude of the contribution of the CSAS is explored using the solid geometry of concentric spheres. With this starting point, clinical conditions in which CSF dynamics are not easily understood are explored regarding the potential role of the CSAS. Overall, problems of CSF dynamics are easily understood. Insights may be gained when the results of a pathological process or its treatment vary from what has been expected. RESULTS Acute changes in ventricular volume at the time that hydrocephalus develops, the failure of shunts, and the changes in ventricular volume with shunt repair may occur very rapidly. Changes in the volume of water in the brain, especially in the brain substance itself, are unlikely to occur at this rapid rate and may be interpreted as a simple redistribution of the CSF between the ventricle and CSAS with no initial change in the actual volume of brain parenchyma. Problems such as pseudotumor cerebri, shunt failure with nonresponsive ventricles, and negative-pressure hydrocephalus can be explained by assessing the ability of ventricular CSF to flow to the CSAS and the ability of this fluid to exit this compartment. Ventricular enlargement at the time of shunt failure implies a failure of flow between the ventricles and CSAS, implying that all patients who show this phenomenon are potential candidates for ETV. CONCLUSIONS The important role of the CSAS in the pathophysiology of various forms of hydrocephalus has been largely ignored. Attention to the dynamics of the CSF in this compartment will improve understanding of enigmatic conditions of hydrocephalus and improve selection criteria for treatment paradigms such as ETV. These concepts lead to clearly defined problems that may be solved by the creation of a central database to address these issues.

[1]  H. Chizeck,et al.  Relationship between intracranial and sagittal sinus pressure in normal and hydrocephalic dogs. , 1988, Pediatric neuroscience.

[2]  O. Al-Mefty,et al.  Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  B. Yamini,et al.  Lumboperitoneal Shunting as a Treatment for Slit Ventricle Syndrome , 2002, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[4]  W. Dandy,et al.  INTERNAL HYDROCEPHALUS: An Experimental, Clinical and Pathological Study , 1964 .

[5]  H. Rekate.  Brain turgor (Kb): intrinsic property of the brain to resist distortion. , 1992, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[6]  Marvin Bergsneider,et al.  Development of Guidelines for Idiopathic Normal-pressure Hydrocephalus: Introduction , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[7]  W. Dandy,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL, CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL STUDY: Part 1.—Experimental Studies , 1914 .

[8]  H. Rekate,et al.  Ventricular shunt removal: the ultimate treatment of the slit ventricle syndrome. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  H. Weiner,et al.  Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid infection and/or hemorrhage. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  H. Rekate,et al.  Treatment of refractory intracranial hypertension in a spina bifida patient by a concurrent ventricular and cisterna magna-to-peritoneal shunt , 2005, Child's Nervous System.

[11]  R. D. Adams,et al.  The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. , 1965, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[12]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Intracranial venous sinus hypertension: cause or consequence of hydrocephalus in infants? , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  U. Meier,et al.  Endoscopic ventriculostomy versus shunt operation in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostics and indication. , 2000, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[14]  H. Chizeck,et al.  Ventricular volume regulation: a mathematical model and computer simulation. , 1988, Pediatric neuroscience.

[15]  F. Sklar,et al.  Significance of postshunt ventricular asymmetries. , 1981, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  A. Chutorian,et al.  Increased intraventricular pressure without ventriculomegaly in children with shunts: "normal volume" hydrocephalus. , 1979, Neurosurgery.

[17]  H. Rekate,et al.  Elevated intracranial venous pressure as a universal mechanism in pseudotumor cerebri of varying etiologies , 1996, Neurology.

[18]  H. Rekate,et al.  Reexpansion of previously collapsed ventricles: the slit ventricle syndrome. , 1982, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  M. Dias,et al.  Low-Pressure Shunt ‘Malfunction’ following Lumbar Puncture in Children with Shunted Obstructive Hydrocephalus , 1999, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[20]  E. de Divitiis,et al.  Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[21]  H. Rekate.  Classification of slit-ventricle syndromes using intracranial pressure monitoring. , 1993, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[22]  B. Yamini,et al.  Pseudotumor Cerebri Patients with Shunts from the Cisterna Magna: Clinical Course and Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Data , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[23]  M. Weiss,et al.  Effects of prolonged cerebrospinal fluid shunting on the skull and brain. , 1973, Journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  W. Dandy,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL STUDY OF INTERNAL HYDROCEPHALUS , 1913 .

[25]  O. Sato,et al.  Experimental models of congenital hydrocephalus and comparable clinical problems in the fetal and neonatal periods , 1996, Child's Nervous System.

[26]  H. Rekate,et al.  Severe intracranial hypertension in slit ventricle syndrome managed using a cisterna magna-ventricle-peritoneum shunt. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  H. Rekate.  Longstanding overt ventriculomegaly in adults: pitfalls in treatment with endoscopic third ventriculostomy. , 2007, Neurosurgical focus.

[28]  H. Rekate,et al.  Lumboperitoneal Shunts in Children , 2002, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[29]  K. Shulman,et al.  Hydrocephalus: a review of etiology and treatment. , 1960, The Journal of pediatrics.

[30]  A. Borit.  Communicating Hydrocephalus Causing Aqueductal Stenosis , 1976 .

[31]  看護大系編集委員会.  ICU : intensive care unit , 1988 .

[32]  H. Rekate.  Circuit diagram of the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid. 1989. , 1994, Pediatric neurosurgery.

[33]  Low-pressure hydrocephalic state and viscoelastic alterations in the brain. , 1994 .

[34]  Christian W. Sikorski,et al.  Lumbar CSF Shunting Preferentially Drains the Cerebral Subarachnoid over the Ventricular Spaces: Implications for the Treatment of Slit Ventricle Syndrome , 2004, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[35]  A. Borti.  Communicating hydrocephalus causing aqueductal stenosis. , 1976, Neuropadiatrie.

[36]  H. Rekate.  The Slit Ventricle Syndrome: Advances Based on Technology and Understanding , 2004, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[37]  G. Bahl,et al.  Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus may be a “Two Hit” disease: Benign external hydrocephalus in infancy followed by deep white matter ischemia in late adulthood , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.