Quantitative autoradiographic analysis of [3H]carfentanil binding to mu opiate receptors in the rat brain

Fentanyl and its derivatives are considered among the most potent opiate analgesic/euphoriants. The pharmacological literature generally supports a μ opiate receptor site of action for the fentanyl derivatives, but some observations suggest that other sites of action may be involved in producing the extremely potent fentanyl effects. In order to investigate the mechanism of action of fentanyl‐like drugs further, [3H]carfentanil was used as a radioligand to image high‐affinity carfentanil binding sites in slidemounted sections of the rat brain (receptor autoradiography). In parallel studies the prototypical μ opiate agonist radioligand [3H]DAMGO ([D‐Ala2‐MePhe4‐Glyol5]enkephalin) was also used. The working hypothesis was that if carfentanil was acting through another high‐affinity site besides the μ opiate receptor, the distribution pattern of the autoradiographic image produced by [3H]carfentanil should be significantly different than the autoradiographic image produced by [3H]carfentanil should be significantly different than the autoradiographic pattern displayed by the well‐characterized and selective μ opiate [3H]DAMGO. Thirty‐five brain regions were examined for specific [3H]carfentanil and [3H]DAMGO binding. The absolute and relative densities of the sites were essentially identical. The highest levels of binding were observed in the “patch” areas of the striatum (131 ± 5 fmol/mg T. E. for [3H]carfentanil; 162 ± 13 fmol/mg T. E. for [3H]DAMGO). The lowest levels were observed in the cerebellum where no specific binding of either radioligand was observed. The overall distribution pattern of the two radioligands produced a correlation coefficient of 0.95; the distribution pattern was prototypical for the μ opiate receptor as reported previously by other groups. Despite the nearly identical distribution patterns, an intriguing difference in the interaction of DAMGO and carfentanil with the μ opiate receptor was observed. The biologically active nonhydrolyzable analog of GTP, GTPγS, was able to completely abolish or greatly diminish specific [3H]DAMGO binding depending on brain region; GTPγS had little or no effect on specific [3H]carfentanil binding. This latter difference in the molecular interaction of DAMGO and carfentanil with the μ opiate receptor may indicate that some of the observed differences in the effects of fentanyl‐like opiates may be due to a difference in the intrinsic activity of the fentanyl derivatives at the μ opiate receptor. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  G. Loew,et al.  Pharmacological profiles of fentanyl analogs at μ, δ and κ opiate receptors , 1992 .

[2]  B. Yoburn,et al.  Evaluation of receptor mechanism mediating fentanyl analgesia and toxicity. , 1991, European journal of pharmacology.

[3]  R. Glennon,et al.  Autoradiographic characterization of (+-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-[125I] iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane ([125I]DOI) binding to 5-HT2 and 5-HT1c receptors in rat brain. , 1990, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[4]  M. Kuhar,et al.  μ Opiate receptors are selectively labelled by [3H]carfentanil in human and rat brain , 1989 .

[5]  E. sanders-Bush,et al.  Lysergic acid diethylamide and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine are partial agonists at serotonin receptors linked to phosphoinositide hydrolysis. , 1988, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[6]  H. Loh,et al.  Lipid Requirement for μ Opioid Receptor Binding , 1987 .

[7]  H. Akil,et al.  Autoradiographic differentiation of mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptors in the rat forebrain and midbrain , 1987 .

[8]  E. J. Simon,et al.  Selective changes in μ, δ and ϰ opioid receptor binding in certain limbic regions of the brain in Alzheimer's disease patients , 1987, Brain Research.

[9]  M. Titeler,et al.  3H-DOB (4-bromo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamine) labels a guanyl nucleotide-sensitive state of cortical 5-HT2 receptors. , 1987, Molecular pharmacology.

[10]  Dean F. Wong,et al.  Imaging Opiate Receptors in the Human Brain by Positron Tomography , 1985, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  M. Titeler,et al.  Guanyl Nucleotide and Divalent Cation Regulation of Cortical S2 Serotonin Receptors , 1984, Journal of neurochemistry.

[12]  J. Leysen Problems in in vitro receptor binding studies and identification and role of serotonin receptor sites , 1984, Neuropharmacology.

[13]  K. Mack,et al.  Comparison of mu, delta, and kappa opiate binding sites in rat brain and spinal cord. , 1984, Life sciences.

[14]  A. Herz,et al.  Opiate receptor binding sites in human brain , 1982, Brain Research.

[15]  F. Reynolds,et al.  Epidural diamorphine and fentanyl for postoperative pain , 1981, Anaesthesia.

[16]  R. Schulz,et al.  Specificity of opioids towards the μ-, δ- and ϵ-opiate receptors , 1979, Neuroscience Letters.

[17]  John Hughes,et al.  Endogenous opioid peptides: multiple agonists and receptors , 1977, Nature.

[18]  H. Loh,et al.  Molecular characterization of opioid receptors. , 1990, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[19]  H. Loh,et al.  Lipid requirement for mu opioid receptor binding. , 1987, Journal of neurochemistry.

[20]  G. Paxinos,et al.  The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates , 1983 .

[21]  R. Schulz,et al.  Specificity of opioids towards the mu-, delta- and epsilon-opiate receptors. , 1979, Neuroscience letters.

[22]  J. Leysen,et al.  Receptor binding properties in vitro and in vivo of some long-acting opiates. , 1978, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.