Choice, changeover, and travel.

Since foraging in nature can be viewed as instrumental behavior, choice between sources of food, known as "patches," can be viewed as choice between instrumental response alternatives. Whereas the travel required to change alternatives deters changeover in nature, the changeover delay (COD) usually deters changeover in the laboratory. In this experiment, pigeons were exposed to laboratory choice situations, concurrent variable-interval schedules, that were standard except for the introduction of a travel requirement for changeover. As the travel requirement increased, rate of changeover decreased and preference for a favored alternative strengthened. When the travel requirement was small, the relations between choice and relative reinforcement revealed the usual tendencies toward matching and undermatching. When the travel requirement was large, strong overmatching occurred. These results, together with those from experiments in which changeover was deterred by punishment or a fixed-ratio requirement, deviate from the matching law, even when a correction is made for cost of changeover. If one accepted an argument that the COD is analogous to travel, the results suggest that the norm in choice relations would be overmatching. This overmatching, however, might only be the sign of an underlying strategy approximating optimization.

[1]  J. Todorov Concurrent performances: effect of punishment contingent on the switching response. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  J. Farley,et al.  Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J. Nevin Interval reinforcement of choice behavior in discrete trials. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  W. K. Honig Operant behavior : areas of research and application , 1966 .

[6]  A J Neuringer,et al.  Control of responding by a percentage reinforcement schedule , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  W M Baum,et al.  Time allocation and negative reinforcement. , 1973, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  A Silberberg,et al.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules: the relationship between component duration and responding. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  W. Baum,et al.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Formal properties of the matching law. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  R L Menlove,et al.  Local patterns of responding maintained by concurrent and multiple schedules. , 1975, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  R. Shull,et al.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  A I Houston,et al.  How to maximize reward rate on two variable-interval paradigms. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  E. Fantino,et al.  Choice, rate of reinforcement, and the changeover delay. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  A. Brownstein,et al.  Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  Douglas A. Wolfe,et al.  Nonparametric Statistical Methods , 1973 .

[19]  S S Pliskoff,et al.  Undermatching and overmatching: The fixed-ratio changeover requirement. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  P. D. Villiers,et al.  Toward a quantitative theory of punishment. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[21]  William M. Baum,et al.  CHAINED CONCURRENT SCHEDULES: REINFORCEMENT AS SITUATION TRANSITION1 , 1974 .

[22]  W M Baum,et al.  Choice as time allocation. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  N. Squires,et al.  Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  D. Stubbs,et al.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement. , 1969, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.