The connection of distributed generation (DG) has a great impact on the operation and planning of distribution net work, which has a relation to the selection of installation site and optimal capacity of DG. The DG cost is much higher than conventional power, therefore calculation of siting and sizing of DG only considering the transmission losses cannot achieve economic optimum. This paper established transmission loss cost calculation model based on power dependency trace methods and cost flow conservation principle, under the uncertain number, location and individual capacity of DG, the minimal transmission losses cost of distribution network is taken as the objective function, and the site and the capacity of DG are optimized using the improved adaptive genetic algorithm. Its purpose is to make transmission losses cost minimum. Through the analysis of an example, the results using this algorithm is compared with optimization results taking the minimal transmission losses as the objective function, it is verified that the fairly rational selection scheme for installation site and optimal capacity of DG can be obtained with the proposed method.
[1]
Bao Hai.
Node Network Loss Cost Analysis Method in Transmission System
,
2008
.
[2]
陈昡姿,et al.
配电网规划中分布式电源的选址定容研究 Siting and Sizing of Distributed Generation in Distribution Network Planning
,
2013
.
[3]
Ma Qian.
PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION MECHANISM OF NETWORK LOSS FOR POWER SYSTEMS
,
2005
.
[4]
J. Mitra,et al.
Siting and sizing of distributed generation for optimal microgrid architecture
,
2005,
Proceedings of the 37th Annual North American Power Symposium, 2005..
[5]
昡姿 陈.
Siting and Sizing of Distributed Generation in Distribution Network Planning
,
2013
.
[6]
Hai Bao,et al.
The Unscrambling of Marginal Cost Algorithm in Power Market
,
2010,
2010 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference.
[7]
Bao Hai.
Cost analysis of electric power purchase node based on power dependency trace
,
2008
.
[8]
Han Xue-shan.
DETERMINING BUS ELECTRICITY COST OF TRANSMISSION SYSTEM BY THE COST FLOW METHOD
,
2002
.