Five-Axis Machine Tool Volumetric and Geometric Error Reduction by Indirect Geometric Calibration and Lookup Tables

Modern CNC machine tools provide lookup tables to enhance the machine tool’s precision but the generation of table entries can be a demanding task. In this paper, the coefficients of the 25 cubic polynomial functions used to generate the LUTs entries for a five-axis machine tool are obtained by solving a linear system incorporating a Vandermonde expansion of the nominal control jacobian. The necessary volumetric errors within the working volume are predicted from the machine’s geometric errors estimated by the indirect error identification method based on the on-machine touch probing measurement of a reconfigurable uncalibrated master ball artifact (RUMBA). The proposed scheme is applied to a small Mitsubishi M730 CNC machine. Two different error models are used for modeling the erroneous machine tool, one estimating mainly inter-axis errors and the other including numerous intra-axis errors. The table-based compensation is validated through additional on-machine measurements. Experimental tests demonstrate a significant reduction in volumetric errors and in the effective machine error parameters. The LUTs reduce most of the dominant machine error parameters. It is concluded that although being effective in correcting some geometric errors, the generated LUTs cannot compensate for some axis misalignments such as EB(OX)A and EB(OX)Z. The root-mean-square of the translational volumetric errors is improved from 87.3, 75.4, and 71.5 µm down to 24.8, 18.8, and 22.1 µm in the X-, Y-, and Z-directions, respectively.

[1]  Aun-Neow Poo,et al.  Error compensation in machine tools — a review: Part II: thermal errors , 2000 .

[2]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar , 2002 .

[3]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  Generation of a 3D error compensation grid from ISO 230-1 error parameters obtained by a SAMBA indirect calibration and validated by a ball-bar spherical test , 2020, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines : an update , 2008 .

[5]  Robert G. Landers,et al.  Table-Based Compensation for 5-Axis Machine Tools , 2013 .

[6]  Clément Fortin,et al.  Tool path error prediction of a five-axis machine tool with geometric errors , 2002 .

[7]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  Volumetric error formulation and mismatch test for five-axis CNC machine compensation using differential kinematics and ephemeral G-code , 2015 .

[8]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  Modeling and experimental validation of machine tool motion errors using degree optimized polynomial including motion hysteresis , 2011 .

[9]  Mizanur Rahman,et al.  Five axis machine tool volumetric error prediction through an indirect estimation of intra- and inter-axis error parameters by probing facets on a scale enriched uncalibrated indigenous artefact , 2015 .

[10]  Geok Soon Hong,et al.  Experimental implementation of Taylor series expansion error compensation on a bi-axial CNC machine , 2011 .

[11]  Charles Wang,et al.  Measurement and compensation for volumetric positioning errors of CNC machine tools considering thermal effect , 2011 .

[12]  Mahbubur Rahman,et al.  Modeling, measurement and error compensation of multi-axis machine tools. Part I: theory , 2000 .

[13]  Jun Ni,et al.  The real-time error compensation technique for CNC machining systems , 1998 .

[14]  J. Jung,et al.  Machining accuracy enhancement by compensating for volumetric errors of a machine tool and on-machine measurement , 2006 .

[15]  Wuyi Chen,et al.  A methodology for systematic geometric error compensation in five-axis machine tools , 2011 .

[16]  Stephen C. Veldhuis,et al.  Modelling geometric and thermal errors in a five-axis cnc machine tool , 1995 .

[17]  Suk-Hwan Suh,et al.  Enhancement of geometric accuracy via an intermediate geometrical feedback scheme , 1999 .

[18]  Changqing Liu,et al.  Off-line optimization on NC machining based on virtual machining , 2008 .

[19]  Robert G. Landers,et al.  Selection of limited and constrained compensation tables for five-axis machine tools , 2017 .

[20]  S. Sartori,et al.  Geometric Error Measurement and Compensation of Machines , 1995 .

[21]  Robert G. Landers,et al.  Table-Based Volumetric Error Compensation of Large Five-Axis Machine Tools , 2017 .

[22]  R.M.D. Mahbubur,et al.  Positioning accuracy improvement in five-axis milling by post processing , 1997 .

[23]  W. T. Lei,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of five-axis CNC machines through real-time error compensation , 2003 .

[24]  Yuan Kang,et al.  An efficient error compensation system for CNC multi-axis machines , 2002 .

[25]  Wolfgang Knapp,et al.  Model-based ‘Chase-the-Ball’ Calibration of a 5-Axes Machining Center , 2006 .

[26]  Soichi Ibaraki,et al.  Indirect Measurement of Volumetric Accuracy for Three-Axis and Five-Axis Machine Tools: A Review , 2012, Int. J. Autom. Technol..

[27]  J.R.R. Mayer,et al.  Five-axis machine tool calibration by probing a scale enriched reconfigurable uncalibrated master balls artefact , 2012 .

[28]  Shih-Ming Wang,et al.  A new high-efficiency error compensation system for CNC multi-axis machine tools , 2006 .