Integrated Approach for Modelling of Semantic and Pragmatic Dependencies of Information Systems

Traditional semantic models are based on entity notations provided by several links. Links are established to capture semantic detail about relationships among concepts. The ability to describe a process in a clear and sufficiently rich way is acknowledged as crucial to conceptual modelling. Current workflow models used in business process re-engineering offer limited analytical capabilities. Entity-Relationship models and Data Flow Diagrams are closer to the technical system development stage and, therefore, they do not capture organisational aspects. Although object-oriented models are quite comprehensible for users, they are not provided by rules of reasoning and complete integration between static and dynamic diagrams. The ultimate objective of this paper is to introduce principles of integration for different classes of semantic and pragmatic representations.

[1]  Remigijus Gustas,et al.  A Basis for Interation within Enterprise Modelling , 1995 .

[2]  Remigijus Gustas,et al.  Goal driven enterprise modelling: bridging pragmatic and semantic descriptions of information systems , 1996 .

[3]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  An overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985 .

[4]  Ronald J. Brachman,et al.  An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Relative Importance of Structural Constraints and Surface Semantics in Information Modeling , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[6]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  Generalization/Specialization as a Basis for Software Specification , 1982, On Conceptual Modelling.

[7]  John Mylopoulos,et al.  From E-R to "A-R" - Modelling Strategic Actor Relationships for Business Process Reengineering , 1994, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[8]  Remigijus Gustas A Framework for Description of Pragmatic Dependencies and Inconsistency of Goals , 1996 .

[9]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  INFORMATION AS ACTION AND COMMUNICATION , 1995 .

[10]  Michael L. Brodie,et al.  On Conceptual Modelling , 1984, Topics in Information Systems.

[11]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Dynamic Business Models as a Basis for Interoperable Transaction Design , 1997, Inf. Syst..

[12]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXXII , 1996 .

[13]  James Martin,et al.  Object-oriented methods : a foundation , 1995 .

[14]  Edward Yourdon,et al.  Modern structured analysis , 1989 .

[15]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[16]  Remigijus Gustas Towards Understanding and Formal Definition of Conceptual Constraints , 1995 .

[17]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[18]  Eckhard D. Falkenberg,et al.  A Framework of Information System Concepts (The FRISCO Report) , 1998 .

[19]  C. H. Kriebel Management information systems , 1970, ACM '70.

[20]  E. F. Codd,et al.  The Relational Model for Database Management, Version 2 , 1990 .