On the Use of Cloud Analysis for Structural Glass Members under Seismic Events

Current standards for seismic-resistant buildings provide recommendations for various structural systems, but no specific provisions are given for structural glass. As such, the seismic design of joints and members could result in improper sizing and non-efficient solutions, or even non-efficient calculation procedures. An open issue is represented by the lack of reliable and generalized performance limit indicators (or “engineering demand parameters”, EDPs) for glass structures, which represent the basic input for seismic analyses or q-factor estimates. In this paper, special care is given to the q-factor assessment for glass frames under in-plane seismic loads. Major advantage is taken from efficient finite element (FE) numerical simulations to support the local/global analysis of mechanical behaviors. From extensive non-linear dynamic parametric calculations, numerical outcomes are discussed based on three different approaches that are deeply consolidated for ordinary structural systems. Among others, the cloud analysis is characterized by high computational efficiency, but requires the definition of specific EDPs, as well as the choice of reliable input seismic signals. In this regard, a comparative parametric study is carried out with the support of the incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) approach for the herein called “dynamic” (M1) and “mixed” (M2) procedures, towards the linear regression of cloud analysis data (M3). Potential and limits of selected calculation methods are hence discussed, with a focus on sample size, computational cost, estimated mechanical phenomena, and predicted q-factor estimates for a case study glass frame.

[1]  Enrico Spacone,et al.  Collapse limit state definition for seismic assessment of code-conforming RC buildings , 2018, International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering.

[2]  Hany M. Hassan,et al.  Site-specific ground motion modeling for a historical Cairo site as a step towards computation of seismic input at cultural heritage sites , 2020 .

[3]  Iftikhar Azim,et al.  Experimental investigation into the post-breakage performance of pre-cracked laminated glass plates , 2019 .

[4]  I. Iervolino,et al.  On the number of records for structural risk estimation in PBEE , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[5]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Procedures and Criteria for Earthquake-Resistant Design , 1975 .

[6]  L. Galuppi,et al.  Post-breakage in-plane stiffness of laminated glass: an engineering approach , 2019, Glass Structures & Engineering.

[7]  Chiara Bedon,et al.  q-factor estimation for 3D log-house timber buildings via Finite Element analyses , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  Irmela Zentner,et al.  Fragility analysis methods: Review of existing approaches and application , 2017 .

[9]  Brendon A. Bradley,et al.  Guidance on the Utilization of Earthquake-Induced Ground Motion Simulations in Engineering Practice , 2017 .

[10]  Chiara Bedon,et al.  Elastic Critical Moment for the Lateral–Torsional Buckling (LTB) Analysis of Structural Glass Beams with Discrete Mechanical Lateral Restraints , 2020, Materials.

[11]  Roberto Scotta,et al.  Experimentally based q -factor estimation of cross-laminated timber walls , 2016 .

[13]  Jan Belis,et al.  Guidance for European structural design of glass components: support to the implementation, harmonization and further development of the Eurocodes , 2014 .

[14]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  On the number of required response history analyses , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[15]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  Design buckling curves for glass columns and beams , 2015 .

[16]  David Lange,et al.  Performance of structural glass facades under extreme loads – Design methods, existing research, current issues and trends , 2018 .

[17]  Maria Polese,et al.  Stick-IT: A simplified model for rapid estimation of IDR and PFA for existing low-rise symmetric infilled RC building typologies , 2020 .

[18]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[19]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic Fragility Functions via Nonlinear Response History Analysis , 2018, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[20]  B. Borzi,et al.  Refined force reduction factors for seismic design , 2000 .

[21]  Nicola Caterino,et al.  Numerical investigation on the seismic dissipation of glazed curtain wall equipped on high-rise buildings , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[22]  Massimiliano Pittore,et al.  Toward performance-driven seismic risk monitoring for geothermal platforms: development of ad hoc fragility curves , 2018, Geothermal Energy.

[23]  B. Weller,et al.  Examination of Laminated Glass with Stiff Interlayers – Numerical and Experimental Research , 2019, International Journal of Structural Glass and Advanced Materials Research.

[24]  S. Gaudio,et al.  Physics-based seismic input for engineering applications: a case study in the Aterno river valley, Central Italy , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[25]  Chiara Bedon,et al.  Energy-based considerations for the seismic design of ductile and dissipative glass frames , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  Numerical assessment of vibration control systems for multi-hazard design and mitigation of glass curtain walls , 2018 .

[27]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Experimental analysis of steel dissipative bracing systems for seismic upgrading , 2009 .

[28]  Nelson Lam,et al.  Drift Performance of Point Fixed Glass Façade Systems , 2014 .

[29]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  A buckling verification approach for monolithic and laminated glass elements under combined in-plane compression and bending , 2013 .

[30]  Roberto Tomasi,et al.  The new provisions for the seismic design of timber buildings in Europe , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[31]  Johannes K. Kuntsche,et al.  Engineering design of laminated safety glass considering the shear coupling: a review , 2019, Glass Structures & Engineering.

[32]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  A more rational selection of the behaviour factor for seismic design according to Eurocode 8 , 2019 .

[33]  C. V. Girija Vallabhan,et al.  Behaviour of window glass panels during earthquakes , 1997 .

[34]  Fatemeh Jalayer,et al.  Bayesian Cloud Analysis: efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[35]  Andreas J. Kappos,et al.  Evaluation of behaviour factors on the basis of ductility and overstrength studies , 1999 .

[36]  Marios K. Chryssanthopoulos,et al.  Probabilistic evaluation of behaviour factors in EC8-designed R/C frames , 2000 .

[37]  Attilio De Martino,et al.  Seismic Behaviour of EC8-Compliant Moment Resisting and Concentrically Braced Frames , 2019 .

[38]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  Safety Issues in the Seismic Design of Secondary Frameless Glass Structures , 2019, Safety.