In this paper an expression for determining the frequency of the “voting paradox” as a function of the number of voters, the number of alternatives to be voted upon, and cultural characteristics of the voters, is derived. In the analysis a voter's ranking of the given alternatives is represented by a skewsymmetric matrix whose elements also satisfy a certain transitivity condition. The collective ranking of the alternatives is obtained under simple majority rule by summation of the actual individual rankings and consequently can likewise be represented by a skewsymmetric matrix. It is then shown that the existence of the paradox corresponds to the nonexistence of a row in the matrix denoting the collective ranking whose entries are all nonnegative. Cultural effects are incorporated by assigning to each possible individual ranking of alternatives a probability. It is then shown that when all possible rankings of three alternatives are equally likely and the number of voters becomes very large, the probability of the paradox approaches a definite limit, vig .087. Exact values for the probability of the paradox for several cases in which the number of alternatives exceeds three are also presented.
[1]
J. Wolfowitz,et al.
Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.
,
1951
.
[2]
F. David.
A note on the evaluation of the multivariate normal integral
,
1953
.
[3]
H. Ruben.
ON THE MOMENTS OF ORDER STATISTICS IN SAMPLES FROM NORMAL POPULATIONS
,
1954
.
[4]
K. May.
Intransitivity, Utility, and the Aggregation of Preference Patterns
,
1954
.
[5]
M. Kendall,et al.
The advanced theory of statistics
,
1945
.
[6]
Gordon Tullock,et al.
A Measure of the Importance of Cyclical Majorities
,
1965
.
[7]
Abram Bergson,et al.
Essays in normative economics
,
1966
.
[8]
David Klahr,et al.
A Computer Simulation of the Paradox of Voting
,
1966,
American Political Science Review.