Smart groups of smart people: Evidence for IQ as the origin of collective intelligence in the performance of human groups

Abstract What allows groups to behave intelligently? One suggestion is that groups exhibit a collective intelligence accounted for by number of women in the group, turn-taking and emotional empathizing, with group-IQ being only weakly-linked to individual IQ (Woolley, Chabris, Pentland, Hashmi, & Malone, 2010). Here we report tests of this model across three studies with 312 people. Contrary to prediction, individual IQ accounted for around 80% of group-IQ differences. Hypotheses that group-IQ increases with number of women in the group and with turn-taking were not supported. Reading the mind in the eyes (RME) performance was associated with individual IQ, and, in one study, with group-IQ factor scores. However, a well-fitting structural model combining data from studies 2 and 3 indicated that RME exerted no influence on the group-IQ latent factor (instead having a modest impact on a single group test). The experiments instead showed that higher individual IQ enhances group performance such that individual IQ determined 100% of latent group-IQ. Implications for future work on group-based achievement are examined.

[1]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[2]  J. Horn.  A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis , 1965, Psychometrika.

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[4]  Jon Grahe,et al.  Go forth and replicate! , 2016, Nature.

[5]  M. Neale,et al.  A Comparison of Factor Score Estimation Methods in the Presence of Missing Data: Reliability and an Application to Nicotine Dependence , 2013, Multivariate behavioral research.

[6]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[7]  William Revelle,et al.  The international cognitive ability resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure , 2014 .

[8]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  A common heritable factor influences prosocial obligations across multiple domains , 2011, Biology Letters.

[9]  Jennifer Urner,et al.  Studies In Machiavellianism , 2016 .

[10]  Michael C. Pyryt.  Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies , 1998 .

[11]  C. Chabris,et al.  Reading the Mind in the Eyes or Reading between the Lines? Theory of Mind Predicts Collective Intelligence Equally Well Online and Face-To-Face , 2014, PloS one.

[12]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Genetic Evidence for Multiple Biological Mechanisms Underlying In-Group Favoritism , 2010, Psychological science.

[13]  A. Woolley,et al.  What makes a team smarter? More women. , 2011, Harvard business review.

[14]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Does Learning to Read Improve Intelligence? A Longitudinal Multivariate Analysis in Identical Twins From Age 7 to 16 , 2014, Child development.

[15]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Genetics of intelligence , 2006, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[16]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[17]  E. A. Locke.  Why emotional intelligence is an invalid concept , 2005 .

[18]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Common genetic influences underpin religiosity, community integration, and existential uncertainty , 2013 .

[19]  H. Chiang,et al.  The New Synthesis , 2019, Creatures of Cain.

[20]  Thomas J. Bouchard,et al.  Personality, problem-solving procedure, and performance in small groups. , 1969 .

[21]  Wm. R. Wright.  General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[22]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. , 2001, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[23]  William Shockley,et al.  On the Statistics of Individual Variations of Productivity in Research Laboratories , 1957, Proceedings of the IRE.

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  L J Whalley,et al.  Human cognitive ability is influenced by genetic variation in components of postsynaptic signalling complexes assembled by NMDA receptors and MAGUK proteins , 2014, Translational Psychiatry.

[26]  K. Laland,et al.  Identification of the Social and Cognitive Processes Underlying Human Cumulative Culture , 2012, Science.

[27]  J. Raven,et al.  Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales , 1962 .

[28]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Brother–sister differences in the g factor in intelligence: analysis of full, opposite-sex siblings from the NLSY1979 , 2007 .

[29]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Childhood Socioeconomic Status Amplifies Genetic Effects on Adult Intelligence , 2013, Psychological science.

[30]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed. , 2013, Psychology and aging.

[31]  David Weschsler,et al.  Concept of collective intelligence. , 1971 .

[32]  J. Haidt.  The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology , 2007, Science.

[33]  Timothy C. Bates,et al.  Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and in-group favoritism: evidence from genetic analyses of right-wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. , 2014, Journal of personality.

[34]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  The Personnel Test: a restandardized abridgment of the Otis S-A test for business and industrial use. , 1939 .

[35]  Timothy R. Brick,et al.  OpenMx 2.0: Extended Structural Equation and Statistical Modeling , 2015, Psychometrika.

[36]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Stuart J. Ritchie,et al.  Enduring Links From Childhood Mathematics and Reading Achievement to Adult Socioeconomic Status , 2013, Psychology Science.

[38]  Dustin Wood,et al.  What do conscientious people do? Development and validation of the Behavioral Indicators of Conscientiousness (BIC). , 2010, Journal of research in personality.

[39]  A. Caspi,et al.  The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes , 2007, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[40]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[41]  Mitsutoshi Okazaki,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory（NEO-PI-R）を用いたてんかん患者におけるパーソナリティ傾向に関する検討 , 2018 .

[42]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  J P GUILFORD,et al.  The measurement of individual differences in originality. , 1953, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  James A. Reggia,et al.  Go forth and replicate. , 2001 .