Generic, Simple Risk Stratification Model for Heart Valve Surgery

Background—Heart valve surgery has an associated in-hospital mortality rate of 4% to 8%. This study aims to develop a simple risk model to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing heart valve surgery to provide information to patients and clinicians and to facilitate institutional comparisons. Methods and Results—Data on 32 839 patients were obtained from the Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland on patients who underwent heart valve surgery between April 1995 and March 2003. Data from the first 5 years (n=16 679) were used to develop the model; its performance was evaluated on the remaining data (n=16 160). The risk model presented here is based on the combined data. The overall in-hospital mortality was 6.4%. The risk model included, in order of importance (all P<0.01), operative priority, age, renal failure, operation sequence, ejection fraction, concomitant tricuspid valve surgery, type of valve operation, concomitant CABG surgery, body mass index, preoperative arrhythmias, diabetes, gender, and hypertension. The risk model exhibited good predictive ability (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P=0.78) and discriminated between high- and low-risk patients reasonably well (receiver-operating characteristics curve area, 0.77). Conclusions—This is the first risk model that predicts in-hospital mortality for aortic and/or mitral heart valve patients with or without concomitant CABG. Based on a large national database of heart valve patients, this model has been evaluated successfully on patients who had valve surgery during a subsequent time period. It is simple to use, includes routinely collected variables, and provides a useful tool for patient advice and institutional comparisons.

[1]  Laura P Coombs,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[2]  Timothy J Gardner,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[3]  S L Normand,et al.  Cardiac surgery report cards: comprehensive review and statistical critique. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  N. Birkmeyer,et al.  Multivariable prediction of in-hospital mortality associated with aortic and mitral valve surgery in Northern New England. , 2004, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[5]  E. DeLong,et al.  Prediction of operative mortality after valve replacement surgery. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Grunkemeier,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of clinical risk models. , 2001, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  Barry L. Zaret,et al.  Yale University School of Medicine Heart Book , 1992 .

[8]  F B Hu,et al.  Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[9]  E. Hannan,et al.  Predictors of mortality for patients undergoing cardiac valve replacements in New York State. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  J. Ennker,et al.  Current determinants of operative mortality in 1400 patients requiring aortic valve replacement. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Impact of body mass index on outcome in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without valve surgery. , 2003, European heart journal.

[12]  Frederick J Schoen,et al.  Cardiovascular tissue engineering. , 2002, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[13]  P Royston,et al.  The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[15]  Shan Cretin,et al.  How to evaluate and improve the quality and credibility of an outcomes database: validation and feedback study on the UK Cardiac Surgery Experience , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  S. Nashef,et al.  Regional differences in surgical heart valve disease in Europe: comparison between northern and southern subsets of the EuroSCORE database. , 2003, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[17]  F. Grover,et al.  Risk stratification for cardiac valve replacement. National Cardiac Surgery Database. Database Committee of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[19]  T. David,et al.  Predictors of operative survival after valve replacement. , 1988, Circulation.

[20]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  A. Bernstein,et al.  A method of uniform stratification of risk for evaluating the results of surgery in acquired adult heart disease. , 1989, Circulation.

[22]  M. Amrani,et al.  Validation of four different risk stratification systems in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a UK multicentre analysis of 2223 patients , 2003, Heart.

[23]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  H. Boshuizen,et al.  Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[25]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Developing a prognostic model in the presence of missing data: an ovarian cancer case study. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.