Towards a deeper understanding of abusive head trauma

[1]  A. Eriksson,et al.  No similarities between the Wakefield report on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the Swedish report on traumatic shaking , 2019, Acta paediatrica.

[2]  A. Duhaime,et al.  Abusive head trauma: evidence, obfuscation, and informed management. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[3]  M. Kamphuis,et al.  Implementation of the Dutch expertise centre for child abuse: descriptive data from the first 4 years , 2019, BMJ Open.

[4]  C. Adamsbaum,et al.  Consensus statement on abusive head trauma: additional endorsements , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.

[5]  S. Servaes,et al.  A consensus response on the complete picture: reply to Lynøe and Eriksson , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.

[6]  S. Janson.  The Development of Social and Legal Aspects of Corporal Punishment – a Swedish Paediatrician’s Commentary , 2018, Corporal Punishment of Children.

[7]  C. Adamsbaum,et al.  Flawed Swedish study on traumatic shaking is already being used by defence lawyers and its findings must be ignored , 2018, Acta paediatrica.

[8]  S. Servaes,et al.  Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children , 2018, Pediatric Radiology.

[9]  A. Kemp,et al.  Abusive head trauma and the triad: a critique on behalf of RCPCH of ‘Traumatic shaking: the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking’ , 2018, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[10]  J. Ludvigsson.  Extensive shaken baby syndrome review provides a clear signal that more research is needed , 2017, Acta paediatrica.

[11]  B. Hallberg,et al.  Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’ – a systematic review , 2017, Acta paediatrica.