Towards a deeper understanding of abusive head trauma
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Eriksson,et al. No similarities between the Wakefield report on measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and the Swedish report on traumatic shaking , 2019, Acta paediatrica.
[2] A. Duhaime,et al. Abusive head trauma: evidence, obfuscation, and informed management. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.
[3] M. Kamphuis,et al. Implementation of the Dutch expertise centre for child abuse: descriptive data from the first 4 years , 2019, BMJ Open.
[4] C. Adamsbaum,et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma: additional endorsements , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.
[5] S. Servaes,et al. A consensus response on the complete picture: reply to Lynøe and Eriksson , 2019, Pediatric Radiology.
[6] S. Janson. The Development of Social and Legal Aspects of Corporal Punishment – a Swedish Paediatrician’s Commentary , 2018, Corporal Punishment of Children.
[7] C. Adamsbaum,et al. Flawed Swedish study on traumatic shaking is already being used by defence lawyers and its findings must be ignored , 2018, Acta paediatrica.
[8] S. Servaes,et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children , 2018, Pediatric Radiology.
[9] A. Kemp,et al. Abusive head trauma and the triad: a critique on behalf of RCPCH of ‘Traumatic shaking: the role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking’ , 2018, Archives of Disease in Childhood.
[10] J. Ludvigsson. Extensive shaken baby syndrome review provides a clear signal that more research is needed , 2017, Acta paediatrica.
[11] B. Hallberg,et al. Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’ – a systematic review , 2017, Acta paediatrica.