Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education

Abstract While blended learning in higher education is valued for various reasons such as addressing students' needs for flexibility, blended learning implementation remains a challenging process. Because the teacher lies at the heart of any educational change process, the current qualitative study investigates crucial teacher attributes for blended learning implementation from the perspective of experts. Experts can analyze deep structures of complex organizational problems and hold process knowledge that can generate practical effect. Twelve expert interviews are conducted and reveal two groups of blended learning teacher attributes: seven adaptive attributes such as realizing a pedagogical need for change or creatively connecting technologies to learning processes, and four maladaptive attributes such as a need for a clear understanding of blended learning or feeling anxious about (the implications of) technology. This study utilizes a holistic approach to identify related teacher attributes that critically influence the implementation of blended learning in higher education.

[1]  R. Ellis,et al.  Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design , 2006 .

[2]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[3]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[4]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence , 2017 .

[5]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Students’ perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment , 2017 .

[6]  M. Chi.  Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics , 2006 .

[7]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Philippa Gerbic,et al.  Teaching using a blended approach – what does the literature tell us? , 2011 .

[9]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Leader traits and attributes. , 2004 .

[10]  Robert A. Ellis,et al.  Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning , 2019, Internet High. Educ..

[11]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Teacher educators' professional identity under construction: The transition from teaching face-to-face to a blended curriculum , 2018 .

[12]  Bram De Wever,et al.  Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning , 2015 .

[13]  G. Lindzey,et al.  Theories of Personality , 1958 .

[14]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? , 2019, TechTrends.

[15]  T. Marteau,et al.  The Place of Inter-Rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: An Empirical Study , 1997 .

[16]  Min Kyu Kim,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration. , 2013 .

[17]  J. Tondeur,et al.  Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: a systematic meta-aggregative review , 2019, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[18]  M. Fullan,et al.  Teacher Development And Educational Change , 1992 .

[19]  D. Garrison,et al.  Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Nikolay Tsankov,et al.  Education Majors' Preferences on the Functionalities of E-Learning Platforms in the Context of Blended Learning , 2017, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[21]  Herbert H. Wideman,et al.  Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Paulien C. Meijer,et al.  Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity , 2004 .

[23]  F. Korthagen.  In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education , 2004 .

[24]  J. Voogt,et al.  Collaboration in teacher design teams: Untangling the relationship between experiences of the collaboration process and perceptions of the redesigned curriculum , 2019, Studies in Educational Evaluation.

[25]  C. Dziuban,et al.  Blended learning: A dangerous idea? , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[26]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies , 2018, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

[27]  L. Kearns.  The experience of teaching online and its impact on faculty innovation across delivery methods , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[28]  J. Smuts.  Holism and Evolution , 1926 .

[29]  Albert D. Ritzhaupt,et al.  Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Course design, assessment and evaluation, and facilitation , 2019, Internet High. Educ..

[30]  Terri Johnson,et al.  Technology Adoption in Higher Education: Overcoming Anxiety through Faculty Bootcamp. , 2012 .

[31]  N. Vaughan.  A blended community of inquiry approach: Linking student engagement and course redesign , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  Hui-Min Lai,et al.  The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers' continuance use intention for flipped teaching , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[33]  J. Tondeur,et al.  Students' motivation and subjective task value of participating in online and blended learning environments , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  C. Teddlie,et al.  Mixed Methods Sampling , 2007 .

[35]  Anna Comas-Quinn,et al.  Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: an exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course , 2011, ReCALL.

[36]  R. Saunders.  The role of teacher emotions in change: Experiences, patterns and implications for professional development , 2013 .

[37]  Sarah Katherine Howard,et al.  Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration , 2013 .

[38]  S. Howard,et al.  Teachers: technology, change and resistance , 2015 .

[39]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[40]  T. Guskey.  Professional Development and Teacher Change , 2002 .

[41]  M. Brown,et al.  Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[42]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Examining facilitators' habits of mind in an asynchronous online discussion environment: A two cases study , 2010 .

[43]  J. Voogt,et al.  Curriculum flexibility in a blended curriculum , 2018 .

[44]  Bram de Wever,et al.  The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors' views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[45]  S. McKenney,et al.  Teachers as Co-designers: Scientific and Colloquial Evidence on Teacher Professional Development and Curriculum Innovation , 2019, Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning.

[46]  Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Students' perceptions and their relation to outcomes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Daniel T. Willingham,et al.  Why Don't Students Like School?: A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions About How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom , 2009 .

[48]  Ron Owston,et al.  The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter? , 2018, Internet High. Educ..

[49]  S. A. Becker,et al.  NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition , 2015 .

[50]  Angela Carbone,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Three Different Design Approaches. , 2014 .

[51]  Paul T. Costa,et al.  Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Theory Perspective , 2005 .

[52]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[53]  Josephine Adekola,et al.  Development of an institutional framework to guide transitions into enhanced blended learning in higher education , 2017 .

[54]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .

[55]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[56]  Bram De Wever,et al.  Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review , 2017 .

[57]  W. Westera.  Competences in education: A confusion of tongues , 2001 .

[58]  Gordon W. Allport,et al.  Pattern and growth in personality , 1961 .

[59]  Kemran Mestan,et al.  Create a fine blend: An examination of institutional transition to blended learning , 2019, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology.

[60]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[61]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Information problem solving by experts and novices: analysis of a complex cognitive skill , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  J. Little.  Understanding Data Use Practice among Teachers: The Contribution of Micro-Process Studies , 2011, American Journal of Education.

[63]  Eduard Bonet,et al.  UNDERSTANDING EXPERTISE , 2006 .

[64]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .