Alternate Row Spacing and Plant Density Effects on Forage and Dry Matter Yield of Corn Hybrids (Zea mays L.)

Irrigated field experiments were conducted in the Marmara region of Turkey in 2002 and 2003 to compare alternate 40 : 25 cm row spacings and conventional 65 cm with four different plant densities (65 000, 85 000, 105 000 and 125 000 plants ha -1 ) of three corn hybrids (DK-585, ADA 95-10 and C-955) in some morphological traits and forage and dry matter yield. Morphological traits such as plant height, leaf per plant. stem diameter, ear per plant and ear percentage were measured, forage and dry matter yield was also determined in this study. Hybrids, row spacings and plant densities significantly affected some morphological traits, forage and dry matter yield at 0.01 level. Later maturing hybrids tended to produce taller and thicker stemmed plants. Row spacings and plant densities did not affect plant height. Average stem diameter increased significantly with population density. Row spacings did not influence leaf number, whereas leaf number increased slightly with plant density. On average, all corn plants had slightly more than 1.0 ear per plant in our experiment. Row spacings and plant densities did not affect significantly number of ear per plant. Early maturing DK-585 had the highest ear percentage whilst late maturing C-955 lowest. Yields usually increased with hybrid maturity. When averaged across years, row spacings and plant densities, late maturing C-955 performed significantly better in forage and dry matter yield in all experimental years and combined years. The studies showed favourable advantage for alternate 40 : 25 cm rows over conventional 65 cm row spacings at all plant densities. Average forage and dry matter yields were greater for alternate 40 : 25 cm row spacings than for 65 cm row spacings. However, strong hybrid x row spacing interactions for both forage and dry matter yield were detected.

[1]  A. Uzun,et al.  Effect of Sowing Season and Seeding Rate on the Morphological Traits and Yields in Pea Cultivars of Differing Leaf Types , 1998 .

[2]  R. Bula,et al.  Microenvironment and plant characteristics of corn (Zea mays L.) planted at two row spacings , 1971 .

[3]  D. Farnham Row Spacing, Plant Density, and Hybrid Effects on Corn Grain Yield and Moisture , 2001 .

[4]  J. M. Fulton RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOIL MOISTURE STRESS, PLANT POPULATIONS, ROW SPACING AND YIELD OF CORN , 1970 .

[5]  G. O. Benson Corn Replant Decisions: A Review , 1990 .

[6]  J. Lauer,et al.  Plant Density and Hybrid Influence on Corn Forage Yield and Quality , 1999 .

[7]  R. Blaser,et al.  Plant Constituents of an Early and a Late Corn Hybrid as Affected by Row Spacing and Plant Population1 , 1968 .

[8]  J. A. Lutz,et al.  Row Spacing and Population Effects on Corn Yields 1 , 1971 .

[9]  J. Hanchar,et al.  Row Spacing, Hybrid, and Plant Density Effects on Corn Silage Yield and Quality , 1998 .

[10]  J. Rutger,et al.  Effect of Population and Row Width on Corn Silage Yields1 , 1967 .

[11]  D. G. Cummins,et al.  Corn for Silage as Influenced by Hybrid Maturity, Row Spacing, Plant Population, and Climate1 , 1973 .

[12]  W. Cox,et al.  Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by hybrid, planting date, and plant density , 1991 .

[13]  R. Nielsen Influence of Hybrids and Plant Density on Grain Yield and Stalk Breakage in Corn Grown in 15‐Inch Row Spacing , 1988 .