Consequences Identification in Forecasting and Ethical Decision-Making

Forecasting involves predicting outcomes based on observations of the situation at hand. We examined the impact of the number and types of consequences considered on the quality of ethical decision-making. Undergraduates role-played several ethical problems in which they forecast potential outcomes and made decisions. Performance pressure (difficult demands placed on the situation) and interpersonal conflict (clashes among people in the problem situation) were manipulated within each problem scenario. The results indicated that the identification of potential consequences was positively associated with both higher quality forecasts and more ethical decisions. Neither performance pressure nor interpersonal conflict affected the quality of forecasts or decisions. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings and the use of this research approach are discussed.

[1]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity , 2007 .

[2]  Shane Connelly,et al.  ARTICLES: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures , 2006 .

[3]  Cristina L. Byrne,et al.  The Effects of Forecasting on Creative Problem-Solving: An Experimental Study , 2010 .

[4]  Rosemary A. Schultz,et al.  Performance in Planning: Processes, Requirements, and Errors , 2001 .

[5]  P. Werhane.  Moral Imagination and Systems Thinking , 2002 .

[6]  R. Baumeister.  Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Leader cognition in real-world settings: How do leaders think about crises? , 2007 .

[8]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Innocents in the Forest: Forecasting and Research Methods , 1990 .

[9]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  Improving the Consistency of Conditional Probability Assessments for Forecasting and Decision Making , 1983 .

[10]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness , 2008, Ethics & behavior.

[11]  S. Jasanoff.  Innovation and integrity in biomedical research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure? , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  Harald Schaub,et al.  Errors in Planning and Decision‐making and the Nature of Human Information Processing , 1994 .

[14]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance , 2000 .

[15]  Chase E. Thiel,et al.  Strategies in Forecasting Outcomes in Ethical Decision-Making: Identifying and Analyzing the Causes of the Problem , 2010, Ethics & behavior.

[16]  Alison L. Antes,et al.  Effects of Time Frame on Creative Thought: Process Versus Problem-Solving Effects , 2009 .

[17]  B. P. Lewis,et al.  Thinking about Choking? Attentional Processes and Paradoxical Performance , 1997, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Agnes Petocz,et al.  Moral Theory in Ethical Decision Making: Problems, Clarifications and Recommendations from a Psychological Perspective , 2003 .

[19]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.