Integrating multi-omic features exploiting Chromosome Conformation Capture data

The representation, integration, and interpretation of omic data is a complex task, in particular considering the huge amount of information that is daily produced in molecular biology laboratories all around the world. The reason is that sequencing data regarding expression profiles, methylation patterns, and chromatin domains is difficult to harmonize in a systems biology view, since genome browsers only allow coordinate-based representations, discarding functional clusters created by the spatial conformation of the DNA in the nucleus. In this context, recent progresses in high throughput molecular biology techniques and bioinformatics have provided insights into chromatin interactions on a larger scale and offer a formidable support for the interpretation of multi-omic data. In particular, a novel sequencing technique called Chromosome Conformation Capture allows the analysis of the chromosome organization in the cell’s natural state. While performed genome wide, this technique is usually called Hi–C. Inspired by service applications such as Google Maps, we developed NuChart, an R package that integrates Hi–C data to describe the chromosomal neighborhood starting from the information about gene positions, with the possibility of mapping on the achieved graphs genomic features such as methylation patterns and histone modifications, along with expression profiles. In this paper we show the importance of the NuChart application for the integration of multi-omic data in a systems biology fashion, with particular interest in cytogenetic applications of these techniques. Moreover, we demonstrate how the integration of multi-omic data can provide useful information in understanding why genes are in certain specific positions inside the nucleus and how epigenetic patterns correlate with their expression.

[1]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Statistical confidence estimation for Hi-C data reveals regulatory chromatin contacts , 2014, Genome research.

[2]  Nicole Rusk Genomics: Genomes in 3D improve one-dimensional assemblies , 2013, Nature Methods.

[3]  A. Kenter,et al.  Genomic Architecture may Influence Recurrent Chromosomal Translocation Frequency in the Igh Locus , 2013, Front. Immunol..

[4]  Boris Lenhard,et al.  Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments , 2013, Genome research.

[5]  Job Dekker,et al.  Organization of the Mitotic Chromosome , 2013, Science.

[6]  Pietro Liò,et al.  NuChart: An R Package to Study Gene Spatial Neighbourhoods with Multi-Omics Annotations , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Pietro Liò,et al.  CytoHiC: a cytoscape plugin for visual comparison of Hi-C networks , 2013, Bioinform..

[8]  Renzhi Cao,et al.  The Properties of Genome Conformation and Spatial Gene Interaction and Regulation Networks of Normal and Malignant Human Cell Types , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  Diego di Bernardo,et al.  Colocalization of Coregulated Genes: A Steered Molecular Dynamics Study of Human Chromosome 19 , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  Huidong Shi,et al.  Aberrant epigenetic gene regulation in lymphoid malignancies. , 2013, Seminars in hematology.

[11]  Mikhail Shugay,et al.  Genomic Hallmarks of Genes Involved in Chromosomal Translocations in Hematological Cancer , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Ming Hu,et al.  HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression , 2012, Bioinform..

[13]  Joshua D. Larkin,et al.  TNFα signals through specialized factories where responsive coding and miRNA genes are transcribed , 2012, The EMBO journal.

[14]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  A genome-wide 3C-method for characterizing the three-dimensional architectures of genomes. , 2012, Methods.

[15]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  HiTC - Exploration of High Throughput ’C’ experiments , 2013 .

[16]  Jesse M. Engreitz,et al.  Three-Dimensional Genome Architecture Influences Partner Selection for Chromosomal Translocations in Human Disease , 2012, PloS one.

[17]  Vivek Chandra,et al.  Global changes in nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and inter-domain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate , 2012, Nature immunology.

[18]  Jesse R. Dixon,et al.  Topological Domains in Mammalian Genomes Identified by Analysis of Chromatin Interactions , 2012, Nature.

[19]  Michael S. Becker,et al.  Spatial Organization of the Mouse Genome and Its Role in Recurrent Chromosomal Translocations , 2012, Cell.

[20]  K. Zhao,et al.  Characterization of genome-wide enhancer-promoter interactions reveals co-expression of interacting genes and modes of higher order chromatin organization , 2012, Cell Research.

[21]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  Extensive Promoter-Centered Chromatin Interactions Provide a Topological Basis for Transcription Regulation , 2012, Cell.

[22]  W. D. Laat,et al.  A Decade of 3c Technologies: Insights into Nuclear Organization References , 2022 .

[23]  Ian X. Y. Leung,et al.  Intra- and inter-chromosomal interactions correlate with CTCF binding genome wide , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  C. Glass,et al.  Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[25]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Distribution of DNA methylation, CpGs, and CpG islands in human isochores. , 2010, Genomics.

[26]  I. Amit,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of long range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome , 2011 .

[27]  E. Liu,et al.  An Oestrogen Receptor α-bound Human Chromatin Interactome , 2009, Nature.

[28]  Mark S Handcock,et al.  networksis: A Package to Simulate Bipartite Graphs with Fixed Marginals Through Sequential Importance Sampling. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[29]  Fangcheng Tang,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer , 2007, International Conference on Computational Science.

[30]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. , 2007, Seminars in cancer biology.

[31]  Fraser McBlane,et al.  Recombinase, chromosomal translocations and lymphoid neoplasia: targeting mistakes and repair failures. , 2006, DNA repair.

[32]  Laurie Gordon,et al.  A comprehensive catalog of human KRAB-associated zinc finger genes: insights into the evolutionary history of a large family of transcriptional repressors. , 2006, Genome research.

[33]  M. D. Den Boer,et al.  Expression Levels of TEL, AML1, and the Fusion Products TEL-AML1 and AML1-TEL versus Drug Sensitivity and Clinical Outcome in t(12;21)-Positive Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  T. Misteli,et al.  Spatial genome organization. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[35]  Ray Reagans,et al.  Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range , 2003 .

[36]  G. Dewald,et al.  Cytogenetic and FISH studies in myelodysplasia, acute myeloid leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoma. , 2002, International journal of hematology.

[37]  Rappold,et al.  Human Molecular Genetics , 1996, Nature Medicine.