Failures to Ignore Entirely Irrelevant Distractors

In daily life (e.g., in the work environment) people are often distracted by stimuli that are clearly irrelevant to the current task and should be ignored. In contrast, much applied distraction research has focused on task interruptions by information that requires a response and therefore cannot be ignored. Moreover, the most commonly used laboratory measures of distractibility (e.g., in the response-competition and attentional-capture paradigms), typically involve distractors that are task relevant (e.g., through response associations or location). A series of experiments assessed interference effects from stimuli that are entirely unrelated to the current task, comparing the effects of perceptual load on task-irrelevant and task-relevant (response competing) distractors. The results showed that an entirely irrelevant distractor can interfere with task performance to the same extent as a response-competing distractor and that, as with other types of distractors, the interfering effects of the irrelevant distractors can be eliminated with high perceptual load in the relevant task. These findings establish a new laboratory measure of a form of distractibility common to everyday life and highlight load as an important determinant of such distractibility.

[1]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. , 2010, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Neural processing of fearful faces: effects of anxiety are gated by perceptual capacity limitations. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[4]  M. Woodward,et al.  The prevalence of, and factors associated with, serious crashes involving a distracting activity. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[6]  R. Remington,et al.  Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture , 2006 .

[7]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Right parietal cortex plays a critical role in change blindness. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in visual awareness , 2006, Brain Research.

[9]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interruption of the Tower of London task: support for a goal-activation approach. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Look here but ignore what you see: effects of distractors at fixation. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Jon Driver,et al.  Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  N. Lavie Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  An Exploration of the Relationship Between Ethnicity, Attention Problems, and Academic Achievement , 2004 .

[15]  E. Viding,et al.  Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  G. Woodman,et al.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Y Ian Noy,et al.  Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. , 2004, Applied ergonomics.

[19]  J. Theeuwes Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Auditory attentional capture: effects of singleton distractor sounds. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Individual differences in failing to save everyday computing work , 2003 .

[22]  N. Lavie,et al.  The Role of Perceptual Load in Processing Distractor Faces , 2003, Psychological science.

[23]  Brendan Wallace,et al.  Driver distraction by advertising: genuine risk or urban myth? , 2003 .

[24]  Stephen J. Vodanovich,et al.  Can Accidents and Industrial Mishaps Be Predicted? Further Investigation into the Relationship Between Cognitive Failure and Reports of Accidents , 2003 .

[25]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Ray Dawson,et al.  Reducing the effect of email interruptions on employees , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  Andrew B. Leber,et al.  Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Kara A. Latorella,et al.  The Scope and Importance of Human Interruption in Human-Computer Interaction Design , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  K. Hutchison,et al.  Attentional capture by irrelevant color singletons. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Oculomotor capture by abrupt onsets reveals concurrent programming of voluntary and involuntary saccades , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  A Latorella Kara,et al.  Effects of Modality on Interrupted Flight Deck Performance: Implications for Data Link , 1998 .

[33]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  N Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in negative priming. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[36]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[37]  Gerald E. Larson,et al.  Further evidence on dimensionality and correlates of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire , 1997 .

[38]  N. Lavie Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  J. Theeuwes Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Multiple parallel access in visual attention. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[42]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Dennis Doverspike,et al.  Locus of control and auditory selective attention as predictors of driving accident involvement: A comparative longitudinal investigation☆ , 1992 .

[45]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional selection: Temporally modulated priority tags , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[50]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  D L Fisher,et al.  Limited-channel models of automatic detection: capacity and scanning in visual search. , 1982, Psychological review.

[52]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Can new objects override attentional control settings? , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  G E Larson,et al.  CAN ACCIDENTS BE PREDICTED. AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE COGNITIVE FAILURES QUESTIONNAIRE. (REANNOUNCEMENT WITH NEW AVAILABILITY INFORMATION); JOURNAL ARTICLE FOR PERIOD ENDING 1991 , 1991 .

[55]  A Smith,et al.  Noise, performance efficiency and safety , 1990, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[56]  Warren H. Teichner,et al.  NOISE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, A PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL APPROACH , 1963 .

[57]  Cyril M. Harris,et al.  Handbook of Noise Control , 1957 .