Historical and potential future contributions of power technologies to global warming

Using the mathematical formalism of the Brazilian Proposal to the IPCC, we analyse eight power technologies with regard to their past and potential future contributions to global warming. Taking into account detailed bottom-up technology characteristics we define the mitigation potential of each technology in terms of avoided temperature increase by comparing a “coal-only” reference scenario and an alternative low-carbon scenario. Future mitigation potentials are mainly determined by the magnitude of installed capacity and the temporal deployment profile. A general conclusion is that early technology deployment matters, at least within a period of 50–100 years. Our results conclusively show that avoided temperature increase is a better proxy for comparing technologies with regard to their impact on climate change, and that numerous short-term comparisons based on annual or even cumulative emissions may be misleading. Thus, our results support and extend the policy relevance of the Brazilian Proposal in the sense that not only comparisons between countries, but also comparisons between technologies could be undertaken on the basis of avoided temperature increase rather than on the basis of annual emissions as is practiced today.

[1]  B. Eickhout,et al.  Responsibility for past and future global warming: timehorizon and non-linearities in the climate system , 2003 .

[2]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  Biomass as Feedstock for A Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply , 2005 .

[3]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage , 2008 .

[4]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[5]  E. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment part I: LCA and decision analysis , 2001 .

[6]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  A 1°×1° resolution data set of historical anthropogenic trace gas emissions for the period 1890–1990 , 2001 .

[7]  W. Krewitt.  External costs of energy--do the answers match the questions?: Looking back at 10 years of ExternE , 2002 .

[8]  I. Lima,et al.  Methane Emissions from Large Dams as Renewable Energy Resources: A Developing Nation Perspective , 2007 .

[9]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Atmospheric CO 2 records from sites in the SIO air sampling network , 1994 .

[10]  Ricardo Guerrero-Lemus,et al.  Concentrated Solar Power , 2013 .

[11]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions of nuclear energy: A review , 2008 .

[12]  M. Thring.  World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[13]  Vasilis Fthenakis,et al.  Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar electric-and nuclear power : A life-cycle study , 2007 .

[14]  Halldór Ármannsson,et al.  CO2 emissions from geothermal power plants and natural geothermal activity in Iceland , 2005 .

[15]  B. V. D. Zwaana,et al.  The learning potential of photovoltaics : implications for energy policy , 2004 .

[16]  Bruce G. Miller.  CO 2 Capture and Storage , 2010 .

[17]  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[18]  J. Mason,et al.  The technical, geographical, and economic feasibility for solar energy to supply the energy needs of the US , 2009 .

[19]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  A Generalized Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia , 2001 .

[20]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Geothermal Power Plants , 2021, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences.

[21]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Binary Cycle Power Plants , 2008 .

[22]  M. Kubik.  The Future of Geothermal Energy , 2006 .

[23]  K. Kaygusuz.  Hydropower and the World's Energy Future , 2004 .

[24]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Towards fossil-based electricity systems with integrated CO2 capture: Implications of an illustrative long-term technology policy , 2005 .

[25]  R. F. Keeling,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 Records from Sites in the Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO) Air Sampling Network (1985 - 2007) , 2008 .

[26]  Burkhard Sanner,et al.  Current status, prospects and economic framework of geothermal power production in Germany , 2003 .

[27]  Roberto Schaeffer,et al.  Global warming potentials: The case of emissions from dams , 1995 .

[28]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Double‐Counting in Life Cycle Calculations , 2008 .

[29]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Renewable Energy in the Context of Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[30]  Eckhard Lüpfert,et al.  Parabolic Trough Power Plants , 2012 .

[31]  R. Steeneveldt,et al.  CO2 Capture and Storage: Closing the Knowing–Doing Gap , 2006 .

[32]  Konrad Hungerbühler.  Editorial notes for the international journal of LCA , 1999 .

[33]  Marco Aurélio dos Santos,et al.  Gross greenhouse gas fluxes from hydro-power reservoir compared to thermo-power plants , 2006 .

[34]  Suzana Kahn Ribeiro,et al.  Comments on the Brazilian Proposal and contributions to global temperature increase with different climate responses—CO2 emissions due to fossil fuels, CO2 emissions due to land use change , 2004 .

[35]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  Valuing the Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Nuclear Power: A Critical Survey , 2008 .

[36]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Subsidies for electricity-generating technologies: A review , 2010 .

[37]  Marco Raugei,et al.  Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: Current state of the art and future outlooks , 2009 .

[38]  Gerald L. Kulcinski,et al.  US electric industry response to carbon constraint: a life-cycle assessment of supply side alternatives , 2005 .

[39]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Balancing Act : a Triple Bottom Line Analysis of the Australian Economy , 2005 .

[40]  Michiel Schaeffer,et al.  The Brazilian Proposal and other Options for International Burden Sharing: an evaluation of methodological and policy aspects using the FAIR model , 1999 .

[41]  Alexander Wokaun,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies , 1999 .

[42]  Edgar G. Hertwich,et al.  A decision-analytic framework for impact assessment , 2001 .

[43]  Oliver Paish,et al.  Small hydro power: technology and current status , 2002 .

[44]  Comparing indicators for contributions to climate change , 2002 .

[45]  John Davison,et al.  Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2 , 2007 .

[46]  H. Grassl,et al.  World in transition: towards sustainable energy systems , 2004 .

[47]  R. Sims,et al.  An overview of current industry and RD&D activities , 2008 .

[48]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits , 2000 .

[49]  D. Pennington,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment Workshop Summary Midpoints versus Endpoints: The Sacrifices and Benefits , 2000 .

[50]  Sven-Erik Thor,et al.  Long‐term research and development needs for wind energy for the time frame 2000–2020 , 2002 .

[51]  Zhixin Wang,et al.  The development and application practice of wind–solar energy hybrid generation systems in China , 2009 .

[52]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  GREENHOUSE GAS ANALYSIS OF SOLAR-THERMAL ELECTRICITY GENERATION , 1999 .

[53]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[54]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[55]  R. Haas,et al.  Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale , 2008 .

[56]  Wilhelm Bier,et al.  Nuclear Power, The Energy Balance , 2005 .

[57]  J. Darmstadter,et al.  Energy in the world economy , 1971 .

[58]  R. Houghton,et al.  Carbon Flux to the Atmosphere from Land-Use Changes 1850-2005 (NDP-050) , 2008 .

[59]  Alexandre Szklo,et al.  The vulnerability of renewable energy to climate change in Brazil , 2009 .

[60]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[61]  Gabriel Gallagher,et al.  Biomass for electricity generation , 2001 .

[62]  Tony Oliver,et al.  Clean fossil-fuelled power generation , 2008 .

[63]  James J. Dooley,et al.  Modeling greenhouse gas energy technology responses to climate change , 2004 .

[64]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, 1751 - 2006 (published 2009) , 2009 .

[65]  Ronald DiPippo.  Chapter 8 – Binary Cycle Power Plants , 2005 .

[66]  R. Sepanski,et al.  TRENDS '90: A compendium of data on global change , 1991 .

[67]  Hezlin Ashraf-Ball,et al.  Will British weather provide reliable electricity , 2008 .

[68]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Current State of Development of Electricity-Generating Technologies: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[69]  V. Stefánsson.  Investment cost for geothermal power plants , 2002 .

[70]  D. Stern,et al.  Estimates of Global Anthropogenic Methane Emissions 1860-1993 , 1996 .

[71]  Daniel Weisser,et al.  A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies , 2007 .

[72]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[73]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Global and hemispheric temperature anomalies - land and marine instrumental records , 1994 .

[74]  Manfred Fischedick,et al.  Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany , 2007 .

[75]  P. A. Østergaard.  Geographic aggregation and wind power output variance in Denmark , 2008 .

[76]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Uncertainty in Impact and Externality Assessments - Implications for Decision-Making (13 pp) , 2006 .

[77]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany , 2008 .

[78]  Paul Bairoch,et al.  World energy production, 1800-1985 =: Production mondiale d'énergie, 1800-1985 , 1991 .

[79]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2007 .

[80]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[81]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage—Part B: Chain analysis of promising CCS options , 2007 .

[82]  Toshihiko Masui,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Scenarios of global ecosystem services Changes in Nature's Balance Sheet: Model-based Estimates of Future Worldwide Ecosystem Services , 2005 .

[83]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Wind turbines in Brazil and Germany: an example of geographical variability in life-cycle assessment , 2004 .

[84]  M. M. S. D. Araújo,et al.  GHG historical contribution by sectors, sustainable development and equity , 2007 .

[85]  Monique Hoogwijk,et al.  Exploring the impact on cost and electricity production of high penetration levels of intermittent electricity in OECD Europe and the USA, results for wind energy , 2007 .

[86]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants , 2009 .

[87]  A. Chambers,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2008 , 2008 .

[88]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[89]  Winfried Hoffmann,et al.  PV solar electricity industry: Market growth and perspective , 2006 .