Network Structure and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Spatial Correlation Network - A Study Based on Data from 30 Provinces in China

Based on the perspective of the value chain of agricultural science and technology innovation, in this paper, we divided the process of agricultural science and technology innovation into two stages: the Research and Development (R&D) of agricultural technology and the application of agricultural technology. We took the efficiency of agricultural science and technology innovation of the two stages as a comprehensive index measure for the development of agricultural science and technology innovation in China. On this basis, we used social network analysis to establish a two-stage spatial correlation network for the innovation development of agricultural science and technology in China. The spatial-temporal evolution trends, structural characteristics, and influencing factors of the network were analyzed from the three aspects of the overall, local, and individual network structure. The results show that: a. The development of agricultural science and technology innovation in China demonstrated a clear spatial correlation and spillover effect, and the spatial correlation network was in a connected state. b. The network had the distribution characteristics of ‘core-edge’ and strong stability, and the hierarchical structure of the members of each province in the network was gradually broken. c. The differences at the market level in agricultural science and technology, the differences in government support for agriculture, the geographically adjacent relationships, and the level of agricultural economic development were important factors affecting the spatial correlation of agricultural science and technology innovation. This study provides a policy reference to use a cross-regional coordinated development mechanism to solve the uneven and asymmetry problem of the distribution of elements in various regions in China.

[1]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[2]  S. Breschi,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: A Cross-sector Analysis , 2000 .

[3]  Alan Renwick,et al.  Measuring and understanding the drivers of agricultural innovation: Evidence from Ireland , 2015 .

[4]  M. Kafouros,et al.  Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: : The role of region-specific institutions , 2015 .

[5]  Jiaxing Pang,et al.  Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the agricultural sector of China's main grain-producing areas. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[7]  C. Ariza,et al.  Measuring innovation in agricultural firms: A methodological approach , 2020 .

[8]  A. Case Neighborhood influence and technological change , 1992 .

[9]  P. Sakdapolrak,et al.  Do translocal networks matter for agricultural innovation? A case study on advice sharing in small-scale farming communities in Northeast Thailand , 2019, Agriculture and Human Values.

[10]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[11]  Alan Renwick,et al.  What drives innovation in the agricultural sector? A spatial analysis of knowledge spillovers , 2016 .

[12]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  Enhancing innovation in agriculture at the policy level: The potential contribution of Technology Assessment , 2013 .

[13]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Unpacking systemic innovation capacity as strategic ambidexterity: How projects dynamically configure capabilities for agricultural innovation , 2017 .

[14]  Innovation and total factor productivity in organic farming , 2011 .

[15]  Md. Mofakkarul Islam,et al.  Innovation in Livestock Genetic Improvement , 2013 .

[16]  John Bessant,et al.  Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review , 1998 .

[17]  David J. North,et al.  The Innovativeness and Growth of Rural SMEs During the 1990s , 2000 .

[18]  S. McCoy,et al.  Distance Effects, Social Class and the Decision to Participate in Higher Education in Ireland. ESRI WP444. December 2012 , 2013 .

[19]  C. O'Donoghue,et al.  Using spatial microsimulation to account for demographic and spatial factors in environmental benefit transfer , 2011 .

[20]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Doris Laepple,et al.  Spatial dependence in the adoption of organic drystock farming in Ireland , 2015 .