EXAMINING THE ADDED VALUE OF THE USE OF AN EXPERIMENT DESIGN TOOL AMONG SECONDARY STUDENTS WHEN EXPERIMENTING WITH A VIRTUAL LAB

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a newly developed software tool, namely the Experiment Design Tool (EDT), on student's learning and inquiry skills. To do so, two conditions were compared; the experimental condition (use of the EDT) and the control condition (no use of the EDT). In each condition, an Inquiry Learning Space (ILS; an online learning environment) and a virtual lab were selected from the Go-Lab learning platform (http://www.golabz.eu/). The data collection involved pre- and post-tests on students' content knowledge and inquiry skills. Results revealed that the integration of the EDT in a computer supported inquiry learning environment facilitated the advancement of content knowledge, whereas the development of inquiry skills requires longer experience with such EDT tools or learning environments. Further research should be pursued, with students of different ages and in different subject domains, in order to investigate the effect of the EDT on students' learning and inquiry skills.

[1]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Identifying potential types of guidance for supporting student inquiry when using virtual and remote labs in science: a literature review , 2015, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[2]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[3]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[4]  Denis Gillet,et al.  Innovations in STEM education: the Go-Lab federation of online labs , 2014, Smart Learning Environments.

[5]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Sound and faulty arguments generated by preservice biology teachers when testing hypotheses involving unobservable entities , 2002 .

[6]  James R. Okey,et al.  Development of an integrated process skill test: TIPS II , 1985 .

[7]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[8]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Scientific Reasoning Across Different Domains , 1992 .

[9]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[10]  J. Arnold,et al.  Understanding Students' Experiments—What kind of support do they need in inquiry tasks? , 2014 .

[11]  Ellen T. Kamp,et al.  Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle , 2015 .

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Use of Heuristics to Facilitate Scientific Discovery Learning in a Simulation Learning Environment in a Physics Domain , 2006 .

[14]  Wouter van Joolingen,et al.  Developments in Inquiry Learning , 2009 .

[15]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[16]  D. Klahr,et al.  Heuristics for Scientific Experimentation: A Developmental Study , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Sharing and Confronting Propositions in Collaborative Inquiry Learning , 2009 .

[18]  Tom Murray,et al.  Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments , 2003 .