Carving Categories in a Continuous World: Preverbal Infants Discriminate Categorical Changes Before Distance Changes in Dynamic Events

Abstract To learn motion verbs and prepositions, children must categorize event components such that jumping 1 meter over the puddle and jumping 3 meters over the puddle are both instances of jumping. Thus, children's categories must allow variability in coordinate properties, while preserving the relational component labeled by motion verbs and prepositions. The current study asks if preverbal infants notice within-category distance changes (e.g., height of a jump) more than across-category distance changes, (e.g., over versus under). Results suggest that categorical changes are most important, which has implications for how children carve a continuous world into categories that coincide with language.

[1]  P. Quinn On the Infant's Prelinguistic Conception of Spatial Relations , 2007 .

[2]  Martha Ann Bell,et al.  Working memory and inhibitory control in early childhood: Contributions from physiology, temperament, and language. , 2004, Developmental psychobiology.

[3]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Infants' ability to parse continuous actions. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[4]  K. Coventry,et al.  Language within your reach: Near–far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives , 2008, Cognition.

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.

[6]  B. Landau,et al.  “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition , 1993 .

[7]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Two-year-olds learn novel nouns, verbs, and conventional actions from massed or distributed exposures. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[8]  M. Bornstein Habituation of attention as a measure of visual information processing in human infants: Summary , 1985 .

[9]  D. Kemmerer “Near” and “far” in language and perception , 1999, Cognition.

[10]  Y. Burnod,et al.  Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a Goal Bias in Infants , 2007 .

[12]  V. Slaughter,et al.  Participant loss due to "fussiness" in infant visual paradigms: a review of the last 20 years. , 2007, Infant behavior & development.

[13]  D. Kemmerer The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Young children can extend motion verbs to point-light displays. , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[15]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Processing Figures and Grounds in Dynamic and Static Events , 2009 .

[16]  Susan Ervin-Tripp,et al.  Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. , 2004 .

[17]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and Imagining in the Cerebral Hemispheres: A Computational Approach , 1988 .

[18]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Stability and Continuity in Mental Development : Behavioral and Biological Perspectives , 2013 .

[19]  Renee L Baillargeon,et al.  Object Permanence in 3 Vi- and 4 l/2-Month-01d Infants , 1987 .

[20]  B. Laeng Lateralization of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Functions: A Study of Unilateral Stroke Patients , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Larissa K. Samuelson,et al.  Memory and attention make smart word learning: an alternative account of Akhtar, Carpenter, and Tomasello. , 1998, Child development.

[22]  R. Nandakumar,et al.  Lexical principles may underlie the learning of verbs. , 1996, Child development.

[23]  L. Hedges,et al.  Categories and particulars: prototype effects in estimating spatial location. , 1991, Psychological review.

[24]  Rebecca J. Brand,et al.  Young children can extend motion verbs to point-light displays , 2002 .

[25]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[26]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[27]  Roberta Michnick Golinkoff,et al.  Action Meets Word: How Children Learn Verbs , 1995 .

[28]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: The typological prevalence hypothesis , 2009 .

[29]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[30]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  The role of good form in young Infants' perception of partly occluded objects. , 2000, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[31]  P C Quinn,et al.  The categorization of above and below spatial relations by young infants. , 1994, Child development.

[32]  D. J. Shaddy,et al.  The Developmental Course of Habituation in Infancy and Preschool Outcome , 2004 .

[33]  P. Quinn,et al.  Development of Categorical Representations for "Above" and "Below" Spatial Relations in 3- to 7-Month-Old Infants. , 1996 .

[34]  M. Bowerman Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective , 1996 .

[35]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Uses and misuses of habituation and related preference paradigms , 2004 .

[36]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Human simulations of vocabulary learning , 1999, Cognition.

[37]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Development of Spatial Cognition , 2007 .

[38]  Soonja Choi Preverbal Spatial Cognition and Language-Specific Input: Categories of Containment and Support , 2006 .

[39]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Individuation, relativity, and early word learning , 2001 .

[40]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Some Effects of a Reduced Relational Vocabulary on the Whodunit Problem , 2007, IJCAI.

[41]  Dcdre Centner On Relational Meaning : The Acquisition of Verb Meaning , 2003 .

[42]  F. A. Adjei Learning to Express Motion Events in Ewe , 2013 .

[43]  L. Cohen,et al.  How infants perceive a simple causal event , 1993 .

[44]  J. Deloache Rate of habituation and visual memory in infants. , 1976, Child development.

[45]  A. Schlottmann,et al.  Causal perception of action-and-reaction sequences in 8- to 10-month-olds. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[46]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? , 1993, Cognition.

[47]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  M. Bornstein,et al.  Habituation and maternal encouragement of attention in infancy as predictors of toddler language, play, and representational competence. , 1989, Child development.

[49]  T. Regier,et al.  Linguistic and non-linguistic spatial categorization , 2000, Cognition.

[50]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Where's the Rabbit? 5.5-Month-Old Infants' Representation of the Height of a Hidden Object , 1987 .

[51]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[52]  L. Talmy Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring , 2000 .

[53]  M. Casasola,et al.  Six-month-old infants' categorization of containment spatial relations. , 2003, Child development.

[54]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Trading Spaces: Carving up Events for Learning Language , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[55]  Cara H. Cashon,et al.  Eight-Month-Old Infants' Perception of Possible and Impossible Events. , 2000, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[56]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Naming motion events in Spanish and English , 2006 .

[57]  Erika Hoff,et al.  Flexibility in early verb use: evidence from a multiple-N diary study. , 2009, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[58]  Barbora Skarabela,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2004 .

[59]  E. Thelen,et al.  Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. , 2006, Psychological review.

[60]  Soonja Choi Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment , 2006 .

[61]  M. Bowerman,et al.  Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns , 1991, Cognition.

[62]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Conceptual precursors to language , 2004, Nature.

[63]  Norman A. Krasnegor,et al.  Measurement of Audition and Vision in the First Year of Postnatal Life: A Methodological Overview , 1985 .

[64]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[65]  S. Kosslyn You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[66]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[67]  Terrill F. Saxon,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in disengagement of fixation in early infancy. , 1999, Child development.

[68]  Rachel Pulverman,et al.  Infants discriminate manners and paths in non-linguistic dynamic events , 2008, Cognition.

[69]  E. Ryan,et al.  Relationships between Early Habituation and Later Cognitive Performance in Infancy. , 1977 .

[70]  Sean Duffy,et al.  Infants and Toddlers Discriminate Amount: Are They Measuring? , 2002, Psychological science.

[71]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Infants' physical knowledge affects their change detection. , 2006, Developmental science.

[72]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  Multiple cues for quantification in infancy: is number one of them? , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[73]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  (1) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms; and , 1987 .

[74]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  How toddlers begin to learn verbs , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  Sean Duffy,et al.  How Infants Encode Spatial Extent. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[76]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why Nouns Are Learned before Verbs: Linguistic Relativity Versus Natural Partitioning. Technical Report No. 257. , 1982 .

[77]  Kenny R. Coventry,et al.  The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of''over , 2001 .

[78]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Reasoning about containment events in very young infants , 2001, Cognition.

[79]  Donka F. Farkas,et al.  Semantics and Cognition . Ray Jackendoff. (Current Studies in Linguistics Series), Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1983 (second printing 1985). Pp. xiii + 283. , 1988 .

[80]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural systems that encode categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: PET investigations , 1998, Psychobiology.

[81]  Marianella Casasola,et al.  Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants' categorization of support spatial relations. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[82]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Infants' coding of location in continuous space. , 1999 .

[83]  Kathy Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Imageability predicts the age of acquisition of verbs in Chinese children* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[84]  Paul C. Quinn,et al.  Young Infants' Performance in the Object-Variation Version of the Above-Below Categorization Task: A Result of Perceptual Distraction or Conceptual Limitation? , 2002, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.