Use of the frozen flux approximation in the interpretation of archaeomagnetic and palaeomagnetic data

Summary. The frozen flux approximation of Roberts & Scott is a constraint on the core field that can be used to aid interpretation of the very sparse datasets that palaeomagnetism and archaeomagnetism provide. It gives bounds on the size of the components of the magnetic field at a point, of the Gauss coefficients, and, if valid over such long time periods, limits the shape of the field during transitions between normal and reversed polarities. The maximum intensity at a point, consistent with the present flux, is 281 /JT or 4 times the maximum field observed today. The present dipole is about 50 per cent of its upper bound. Polarity reversal is impossible if the transition field is purely axisymmetric. None of the measurements we consider violate the frozen flux approximation.

[1]  J. Shaw.  Rapid changes in the magnitude of the archaeomagnetic field , 1979 .

[2]  E. Levy.  Kinematic reversal schemes for the geomagnetic dipole. , 1972 .

[3]  K. Hoffman.  Behavior of the geodynamo during reversal: A phenomenological model , 1979 .

[4]  George E. Backus,et al.  Non‐uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements , 1970 .

[5]  J. Shaw,et al.  The magnitude of the palaeomagnetic field in Iceland between 2 and 6 Myr ago , 1982 .

[6]  D. Walton.  Geomagnetic intensity in Athens between 2000 BC and AD 400 , 1979, Nature.

[7]  E. R. Benton,et al.  Frozen-flux upper limits to the magnitudes of geomagnetic Gauss coefficients, based on MAGSAT observations , 1982 .

[8]  Edward Crisp Bullard,et al.  Kinematics of geomagnetic secular variation in a perfectly conducting core , 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[9]  M. Kovacheva.  Summarized results of the archaeomagnetic investigation of the geomagnetic field variation for the last 8000 yr in south-eastern Europe , 1980 .

[10]  T. Gold,et al.  On the Generation of Magnetism by Fluid Motion , 1950 .

[11]  K. Games.  The magnitude of the archaeomagnetic field in Egypt between 3000 and 0 BC , 1980 .

[12]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  On Analysis of the Secular Variation , 1965 .

[13]  J. Shaw.  Strong Geomagnetic Fields during a single Icelandic Polarity Transition , 1975 .

[14]  J. R. Dunn,et al.  Palaeomagnetic record of a late Tertiary field reversal , 1978 .

[15]  K. Creer,et al.  An interpretation of the behaviour of the geomagnetic field during polarity transitions , 1970 .

[16]  D. R. Barraclough,et al.  Spherical Harmonic Analyses of the Geomagnetic Field for Eight Epochs between 1600 and 1910 , 1974 .

[17]  C. Voorhies,et al.  Pole‐strength of the Earth from MAGSAT and magnetic determination of the core radius , 1982 .

[18]  A. Cox,et al.  Brunhes-Matuyama polarity transition , 1976 .

[19]  J. Booker,et al.  Geomagnetic data and core motions , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  M. Fuller,et al.  Zonal harmonic models of reversal transition fields , 1981 .

[21]  George E. Backus,et al.  Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modelling , 1982 .