The locus of adaptation to altered gain in aimed movements.

Altered gain settings cause a mismatch between the actual movement amplitude across the surface and the distance covered on a real time visual display. The present study pursued three objectives of how adaptation to altered gain affects aimed motor behavior. First, we replicated findings of an earlier study reporting a negative linear relation between gain and both target acquisition time and end-point variability. This means that our data do not agree with the classic U-shaped relation between gain and acquisition time. Second, our results proved to be robust when we manipulated movement difficulty by varying target distance. And third, dividing a movement into four successive sections on the basis of key kinematic events revealed the locus of the adaptation to altered gain within movement execution. Time differences between gain conditions proved to start at a very early part of the movement, but appeared to be absent in the final movement section. In contrast, differences between gain conditions regarding the use of online feedback were also present in the last part of the movement during which the final target approach takes place.

[1]  Thomas G. Whisenand,et al.  Analysis of Cursor Movements with a Mouse , 1997, HCI.

[2]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  Effects of adaptation to altered display gain on the control of single aimed movements. , 2005, Motor control.

[3]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Contributions of vision and proprioception to accuracy in limb movements , 1994 .

[4]  Hans-Leo Teulings,et al.  Digital recording and processing of handwriting movements , 1984 .

[5]  Lorraine G. Kisselburgh,et al.  Rapid visual feedback processing in single-aiming movements. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[6]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[7]  Leslie Buck,et al.  Motor performance in relation to control-display gain and target width , 1980 .

[8]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[9]  Robert L Sainburg,et al.  Nondominant arm advantages in load compensation during rapid elbow joint movements. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  C. K. Yuen,et al.  Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[11]  W. L. Jenkins,et al.  The use of levers in making settings on a linear scale. , 1952 .

[12]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  The role of execution noise in movement variability. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M Hagberg,et al.  Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[14]  Joel S. Greenstein,et al.  Optimizing the Touch Tablet: The Effects of Control-Display Gain and Method of Cursor Control , 1986 .

[15]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[16]  J. J. Bloomberg,et al.  Context-dependent arm pointing adaptation , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  James Gordon,et al.  Accuracy of planar reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  Daniel W. Repperger,et al.  Fitts' law and the microstructure of rapid discrete movements. , 1980 .

[19]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[20]  Robert R A van Doorn,et al.  Influence of different modes of real time visual information on single aimed movements. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[21]  H. P. Birmingham,et al.  The Influence of Control Gain in a First-Order Man-Machine Control System , 1959 .

[22]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Volume 2. Cognitive Processes and Performance , 1994 .

[23]  C. B. Gibbs,et al.  Controller design Interactions of controlling limbs, time-lags and gains in positional and velocity systems , 1962 .

[24]  M L Lin,et al.  Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[25]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  Computer mouse operation: is the left-handed user disadvantaged? , 1997, Applied ergonomics.

[27]  Y. Coello,et al.  Pointing movement visually controlled through a video display: adaptation to scale change , 2000, Ergonomics.

[28]  P Viviani,et al.  Perceptual anticipation in handwriting: The role of implicit motor competence , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M Hagberg,et al.  Measuring and characterizing force exposures during computer mouse use. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[30]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[31]  Romeo Chua,et al.  The Influence of Target Perturbation on Manual Aiming Asymmetries in Right-Handers , 1995, Cortex.

[32]  E. R. Crossman,et al.  Feedback Control of Hand-Movement and Fitts' Law , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[33]  D. Elliott,et al.  Visual regulation of manual aiming , 1993 .

[34]  M. Hammertoe AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE OPTIMAL GAIN OE A VELOCITY CONTROL SYSTEM , 1962 .

[35]  W. L. Jenkins,et al.  Some design factors in making settings on a linear scale. , 1949 .

[36]  Arne Aarås,et al.  Can a More Neutral Position of the Forearm When Operating a Computer Mouse Reduce the Pain Level for Visual Display Unit Operators? A Prospective Epidemiological Intervention Study: Part II , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  R. D Seidler,et al.  Patterns of transfer of adaptation among body segments , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[38]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Laurette Hay,et al.  Contribution of visual information to feedforward and feedback processes in rapid pointing movements , 1986 .

[40]  T J Triggs,et al.  Characteristics of cursor trajectories controlled by the computer mouse , 2001, Ergonomics.

[41]  James G. Phillips,et al.  Effects of Cursor Orientation and Required Precision on Positioning Movements on Computer Screens , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  P. Keuss,et al.  Does the production of letter strokes in handwriting benefit from vision? , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[43]  S. Vogt,et al.  Vision of the hand and environmental context in human prehension , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Rescaling an acquired discrete aiming movement: Specific or general motor learning? , 1997 .

[45]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[46]  Gibbs Cb Methodology of gain studies in man-machine systems. , 1963 .

[47]  R A Abrams,et al.  Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. , 1988, Psychological review.

[48]  C. Bard,et al.  Timing and accuracy of visually directed movements in children: control of direction and amplitude components. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  Gavin P. Lawrence,et al.  Online versus offline processing of visual feedback in the control of movement amplitude. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[50]  D. Elliott Chapter 2 Intermittent Versus Continuous Control of Manual Aiming Movements , 1992 .

[51]  Ian M Franks,et al.  Separate sources of spatial information for distance and location in rapid aiming movements. , 2002, Motor control.

[52]  Digby Elliott,et al.  Vision and motor control , 1992 .

[53]  P J Keuss,et al.  The role of vision in the temporal and spatial control of handwriting. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[54]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  L. Carlton Processing visual feedback information for movement control. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  L Proteau,et al.  Determining movement onsets from temporal series. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[57]  Mats Hagberg,et al.  Computer mouse use in two different hand positions: exposure, comfort, exertion and productivity. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[58]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Kinematics properties of rapid aimed hand movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.