3D Prostate TRUS Segmentation Using Globally Optimized Volume-Preserving Prior

An efficient and accurate segmentation of 3D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images plays an important role in the planning and treatment of the practical 3D TRUS guided prostate biopsy. However, a meaningful segmentation of 3D TRUS images tends to suffer from US speckles, shadowing and missing edges etc, which make it a challenging task to delineate the correct prostate boundaries. In this paper, we propose a novel convex optimization based approach to extracting the prostate surface from the given 3D TRUS image, while preserving a new global volume-size prior. We, especially, study the proposed combinatorial optimization problem by convex relaxation and introduce its dual continuous max-flow formulation with the new bounded flow conservation constraint, which results in an efficient numerical solver implemented on GPUs. Experimental results using 12 patient 3D TRUS images show that the proposed approach while preserving the volume-size prior yielded a mean DSC of 89.5% +/- 2.4%, a MAD of 1.4 +/- 0.6 mm, a MAXD of 5.2 +/- 3.2 mm, and a VD of 7.5% +/- 6.2% in - 1 minute, deomonstrating the advantages of both accuracy and efficiency. In addition, the low standard deviation of the segmentation accuracy shows a good reliability of the proposed approach.

[1]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Semiautomatic 3-D Prostate Segmentation from TRUS Images Using Spherical Harmonics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Florian Jung,et al.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: The PROMISE12 challenge , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[3]  Baowei Fei,et al.  3D ultrasound image segmentation using wavelet support vector machines. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  Huazhong Shu,et al.  Prostate Segmentation in HIFU Therapy , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Olga Veksler,et al.  Fast Approximate Energy Minimization via Graph Cuts , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  A. Fenster,et al.  Three-dimensional prostate segmentation using level set with shape constraint based on rotational slices for 3D end-firing TRUS guided biopsy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[7]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Dual optimization based prostate zonal segmentation in 3D MR images , 2014, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  A. Goh,et al.  2050 CONTEMPORARY IMAGE-GUIDED TARGETED PROSTATE BIOPSY BETTER CHARACTERIZES CANCER VOLUME, GLEASON GRADE AND ITS 3D LOCATION COMPARED TO SYSTEMATIC BIOPSY , 2012 .

[9]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Aaron D. Ward,et al.  Segmentation with Non-linear Regional Constraints via Line-Search Cuts , 2012, ECCV.

[11]  A. Fenster,et al.  Needle segmentation using 3D Hough transform in 3D TRUS guided prostate transperineal therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[12]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  Thomas Deselaers,et al.  ClassCut for Unsupervised Class Segmentation , 2010, ECCV.

[14]  Aaron Fenster,et al.  Prostate Segmentation: An Efficient Convex Optimization Approach With Axial Symmetry Using 3-D TRUS and MR Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Xue-Cheng Tai,et al.  A Continuous Max-Flow Approach to Potts Model , 2010, ECCV.

[16]  Xue-Cheng Tai,et al.  A study on continuous max-flow and min-cut approaches , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Matthieu Guillaumin,et al.  Segmentation Propagation in ImageNet , 2012, ECCV.

[18]  Desire Sidibé,et al.  A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[19]  Mehdi Moradi,et al.  Evaluation of visualization of the prostate gland in vibro-elastography images , 2011, Medical Image Anal..