Media Dialogue: Perceiving and Addressing Community Problems

Scholars have long debated the role of media and discussion in encouraging tolerance and engagement in politics and community. Theories range from the dismissal of effects to the assertion of powerful influences, and from claims of "media malaise" to the promise of "virtuous circles." Of course, results from research exploring these issues vary by context and methods of study. Yet most past research is plagued by at least 1 of 2 methodological weaknesses: the difficulty of assessing causality in cross-sectional survey designs and/or of attributing the observed effects to information gains rather than to the deliberative process itself. Acknowledging these weaknesses, we rely on data from a quasi-experimental study examining a media dialogue effort. In this study, randomly selected public television members and partners were recruited into various forms of "real world" exposure and discussion about the documentary film Two Towns of Jasper. This documentary highlights the divisions in Jasper, Texas following the racial killing of James Byrd, Jr., who was dragged to his death behind a pickup truck by 3 White men. Controlling for a wide range of preexisting differences, including past political discussion and participation, we compared individuals who had different experiences of the intervention. Results reveal that media consumption was positively related with willingness to discuss the issue of race and participate politically around this issue. Above and beyond media consumption, participation in a heterogeneous citizen's forum that discussed the documentary contributed to awareness of racism, as well as increased willingness to further discuss and participate on this issue. This article highlights the importance of citizen dialogue in combination with media consumption for engagement, and suggests an alterative to forums such as citizen juries, study circles, and deliberative polls.

[1]  Sidney Verba,et al.  Small Groups and Political Behavior-A Study of Leadership. , 1961 .

[2]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[3]  John R. Hibbing,et al.  Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs About How Government Should Work , 2002 .

[4]  Mira Sotirovic, Jack M. McLeod.  Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[5]  張卿卿.  Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication: Financial Statements , 1988 .

[6]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[7]  Tali Mendelberg,et al.  Race and Public Deliberation , 2000 .

[8]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.

[9]  D. Rucinski.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[10]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[11]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[12]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Understanding Deliberation , 1999 .

[13]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[14]  Mike Schmierbach,et al.  The Interplay of News Frames on Cognitive Complexity , 2004 .

[15]  S. Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics , 1997 .

[16]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[17]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion , 1995 .

[18]  S. Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics , 1994 .

[19]  M. Schudson,et al.  Why conversation is not the soul of democracy , 1997 .

[20]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Advancing communication science : merging mass and interpersonal processes , 1988 .

[21]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Community Integration, Local Media Use, and Democratic Processes , 1996 .

[22]  Diana C. Mutz.  Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice , 2002, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Dietram A. Scheufele.  Talk or Conversation? Dimensions of Interpersonal Discussion and Their Implications for Participatory Democracy , 2000 .

[24]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Social Structure and Citizenship: Examining the Impacts of Social Setting, Network Heterogeneity, and Informational Variables on Political Participation , 2004 .

[25]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[26]  K. Walsh.  The Democratic Potential of Civic Dialogue , 2007 .

[27]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[28]  L. Sanders,et al.  Against Deliberation , 1997 .

[29]  Tracy E Sulkin,et al.  Habermas in the Lab: A Study of Deliberation in an Experimental Setting , 2001 .

[30]  James S. Fishkin,et al.  The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy , 1995 .

[31]  Katherine Cramer Walsh,et al.  Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life , 2003 .

[32]  Jane J. Mansbridge.  Beyond Adversary Democracy , 1980 .

[33]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[34]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[35]  Michael X. Delli Carpini,et al.  Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation , 2002 .

[36]  R. Huckfeldt,et al.  The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices , 2002, American Political Science Review.