Scaling, normalizing, and per ratio standards: an allometric modeling approach.

The practice of scaling or normalizing physiological variables (Y) by dividing the variable by an appropriate body size variable (X) to produce what is known as a "per ratio standard" (Y/ X), has come under strong criticism from various authors. These authors propose an alternative regression standard based on the linear regression of (Y) on (X) as the predictor variable. However, if linear regression is to be used to adjust such physiological measurements (Y), the residual errors should have a constant variance and, in order to carry out parametric tests of significance, be normally distributed. Unfortunately, since neither of these assumptions appear to be satisfied for many physiological variables, e.g., maximum oxygen uptake, peak and mean power, an alternative approach is proposed of using allometric modeling where the concept of a ratio is an integral part of the model form. These allometric models naturally help to overcome the heteroscedasticity and skewness observed with per ratio variables. Furthermore, if per ratio standards are to be incorporated in regression models to predict other dependent variables, the allometric or log-linear model form is shown to be more appropriate than linear models. By using multiple regression, simply by taking logarithms of the dependent variable and entering the logarithmic transformed per ratio variables as separate independent variables, the resulting estimated log-linear multiple-regression model will automatically provide the most appropriate per ratio standard to reflect the dependent variable, based on the proposed allometric model.

[1]  A. Nevill,et al.  Body mass index: a measure of fatness or leanness? , 1995, British Journal of Nutrition.

[2]  H. Feldman On the allometric mass exponent, when it exists. , 1995, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  A. Nevill,et al.  The need to scale for differences in body size and mass: an explanation of Kleiber's 0.75 mass exponent. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  A. Nevill,et al.  Modelling Maximum Oxygen Uptake-a Case-study in Non-linear Regression Model Formulation and Comparison , 1994 .

[5]  A. Baxter-Jones,et al.  The development of aerobic power in young athletes. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  R. Kronmal Spurious Correlation and the Fallacy of the Ratio Standard Revisited , 1993 .

[7]  J. Fredberg,et al.  Dimensional analysis does not determine a mass exponent for metabolic scaling. , 1987, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  J. Filliben The Probability Plot Correlation Coefficient Test for Normality , 1975 .

[9]  F. Katch,et al.  Use of weight-adjusted oxygen uptake scores that avoid spurious correlations. , 1974, Research quarterly.

[10]  J. Durnin,et al.  Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 Years , 1974, British Journal of Nutrition.

[11]  V. Katch,et al.  Correlational v ratio adjustments of body weight in exercise-oxygen studies. , 1972, Ergonomics.

[12]  A. Heusner,et al.  The allometry equation in the analysis of the standard oxygen consumption and body weight of the white rat. , 1971, Biometrics.

[13]  J M TANNER,et al.  Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards, and their relation to spurious correlation. , 1949, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  John Tyler Bonner,et al.  On size and life , 1983 .

[15]  V L Katch,et al.  Use of the oxygen-body weight ratio in correlational analyses: spurious correlations and statistical considerations. , 1973, Medicine and science in sports.

[16]  P. Åstrand,et al.  Textbook of Work Physiology , 1970 .

[17]  G. Box An analysis of transformations (with discussion) , 1964 .

[18]  K. Pearson Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs , 1897, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London.