The effect of quantum noise on two different deterministic remote state preparation of an arbitrary three-particle state protocols

Multi-particle quantum state deterministic remote preparation is a fundamental and important technical branch in quantum communication. Since quantum noise is unavoidable in realistic quantum communication, it is important to analyze the effect of noise on multi-particle quantum communication protocols. In this paper, we study the effects of noise, such as amplitude damping, phase damping, bit-flip and depolarizing noises, on two deterministic remote preparation of an arbitrary three-particle state protocols, which are based on two different entangled channels, namely $$\chi $$χ state and Brown state. The detailed mathematical analysis shows that the output states of two deterministic remote state preparation (DRSP) protocols are the same in the same noisy environment. That is to say, in the same noisy environment, the effects of noise on two DRSP protocols are the same. This conclusion proves that these two DRSP protocols will produce the same arbitrary three-particle states in the same noise channel environment, and so that these protocols are inherently convergent and can be substituted for each other in certain circumstances. In addition, this paper also takes three-particle states $$a\left| {000} \right\rangle + b{\mathrm{e}^{ic}}\left| {111} \right\rangle $$a000+beic111 as an example and studies the relationship between the fidelity, the target state and the size of the noise factor. The results show that if the target state can be selected, an appropriate target state can effectively resist on the bit-flip noise. If the target state cannot be selected, as the increase in the size of noise factor, the fidelities of the two DRSP schemes in the amplitude damping noise and phase damping noise are always larger than those in the bit-flip noise and depolarizing noise. This conclusion indicates that two protocols have better resistance on amplitude damping and phase damping noise than the bit-flip and depolarizing noises. These findings and analyses will provide valid help in deterministic remote preparation of an arbitrary three-particle state in a noisy environment.

[1]  V. Buzek,et al.  Quantum secret sharing , 1998, quant-ph/9806063.

[2]  Longqi Wang,et al.  Strengthening mechanisms in nanoporous metallic glasses , 2018, Computational Materials Science.

[3]  Yiping Lu,et al.  Joint Remote Preparation of a Multipartite GHZ-class State , 2009 .

[4]  Yi-Xian Yang,et al.  The Quantum Steganography Protocol via Quantum Noisy Channels , 2015, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[5]  C. H. Bennett,et al.  Remote state preparation. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[6]  Gang Xu,et al.  Perfect Quantum Network Coding Independent of Classical Network Solutions , 2015, IEEE Communications Letters.

[7]  YongBin Qiu,et al.  Steganography Using Reversible Texture Synthesis Based On Seeded Re-gion Growing And LSB , 2018 .

[8]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Erratum: Remote State Preparation [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 077902 (2001)] , 2002 .

[9]  T. Berger,et al.  Low-entanglement remote state preparation. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[10]  Yan Xia,et al.  Joint Remote Preparation of a General Three-Qubit State via Non-maximally GHZ States , 2012 .

[11]  Gilles Brassard,et al.  Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing , 2014, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[12]  Gang Xu,et al.  Robust variations of secret sharing through noisy quantum channel , 2014, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[13]  Zhiming Huang,et al.  Performance analysis of simultaneous dense coding protocol under decoherence , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[14]  Debbie W Leung,et al.  Oblivious remote state preparation. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[15]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[16]  Qiaoyan Wen,et al.  Cryptanalysis of the Hillery-Buzek-Berthiaume quantum secret-sharing protocol , 2007, 0801.2418.

[17]  Yan Xia,et al.  Joint remote preparation of an arbitrary three-qubit state via EPR-type pairs , 2011 .

[18]  Yixian Yang,et al.  Joint Remote Preparation of an Arbitrary Three-Qubit State with Mixed Resources , 2010, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[19]  Le Sun,et al.  Effect of quantum noise on deterministic remote state preparation of an arbitrary two-particle state via various quantum entangled channels , 2017, Quantum Information Processing.

[20]  Yixian Yang,et al.  Quantum steganography with large payload based on entanglement swapping of χ-type entangled states , 2011 .

[21]  John Keeney,et al.  Multilevel pattern mining architecture for automatic network monitoring in heterogeneous wireless communication networks , 2016, China Communications.

[22]  H. Lo.  Classical-communication cost in distributed quantum-information processing: A generalization of quantum-communication complexity , 1999, quant-ph/9912009.

[23]  Xiubo Chen,et al.  Controlled remote state preparation of arbitrary two and three qubit states via the Brown state , 2012, Quantum Inf. Process..

[24]  Wei Wang,et al.  Effect of noise on deterministic joint remote preparation of an arbitrary two-qubit state , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[25]  Sai Ji,et al.  Anti-Noise Bidirectional Quantum Steganography Protocol with Large Payload , 2018 .

[26]  Zhiming Huang,et al.  Coherence of one-dimensional quantum walk on cycles , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[27]  Ruohan Meng.  A fusion steganographic algorithm based on Faster R-CNN , 2018 .

[28]  B. Sanders,et al.  Optimal remote state preparation. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[29]  Xinxin Niu,et al.  Novel quantum steganography with large payload , 2010 .

[30]  M. Curty,et al.  Quantum authentication of classical messages , 2001, quant-ph/0103122.

[31]  Alexander N. Korotkov,et al.  Decoherence suppression by quantum measurement reversal , 2010 .

[32]  Gustavo Rigolin,et al.  Fighting noise with noise in realistic quantum teleportation , 2015, 1506.03803.

[33]  Xingming Sun,et al.  Coverless Information Hiding Based on the Molecular Structure Images of Material , 2018 .

[34]  Cong Gao,et al.  Deterministic remote preparation via the Brown state , 2017, Quantum Inf. Process..

[35]  Song-Ya Ma,et al.  Controlled Remote Preparation Via the Brown State with no Restriction , 2016 .