Modelling the initial spread of foot-and-mouth disease through animal movements

Livestock movements in Great Britain (GB) are well recorded and are a unique record of the network of connections among livestock-holding locations. These connections can be critical for disease spread, as in the 2001 epidemic of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) in the UK. Here, the movement data are used to construct an individual-farm-based model of the initial spread of FMD in GB and determine the susceptibility of the GB livestock industry to future outbreaks under the current legislative requirements. Transmission through movements is modelled, with additional local spread unrelated to the known movements. Simulations show that movements can result in a large nationwide epidemic, but only if cattle are heavily involved, or the epidemic occurs in late summer or early autumn. Inclusion of random local spread can considerably increase epidemic size, but has only a small impact on the spatial extent of the disease. There is a geographical bias in the epidemic size reached, with larger epidemics originating in Scotland and the north of England than elsewhere.

[1]  Christl A. Donnelly,et al.  The Foot-and-Mouth Epidemic in Great Britain: Pattern of Spread and Impact of Interventions , 2001, Science.

[2]  I. Kiss,et al.  The network of sheep movements within Great Britain: network properties and their implications for infectious disease spread , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  R. Christley,et al.  Network analysis of cattle movement in Great Britain. , 2005 .

[4]  Rowland R Kao,et al.  The role of mathematical modelling in the control of the 2001 FMD epidemic in the UK. , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[5]  M E J Newman,et al.  Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  L. Danon,et al.  Demographic structure and pathogen dynamics on the network of livestock movements in Great Britain , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  Rowland R Kao,et al.  The impact of local heterogeneity on alternative control strategies for foot-and-mouth disease , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  G. Davies,et al.  The foot and mouth disease (FMD) epidemic in the United Kingdom 2001. , 2002, Comparative immunology, microbiology and infectious diseases.

[9]  J. W. Wilesmith,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of the 2001 foot-and-mouth disease epidemic in Great Britain: the first five months , 2001, Veterinary Record.

[10]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Global task force for influenza , 2005, Nature.

[11]  R. May,et al.  Infection dynamics on scale-free networks. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  S. Cornell,et al.  Dynamics of the 2001 UK Foot and Mouth Epidemic: Stochastic Dispersal in a Heterogeneous Landscape , 2001, Science.

[13]  M. Gilbert,et al.  Cattle movements and bovine tuberculosis in Great Britain , 2005, Nature.

[14]  S. Alexandersen,et al.  Studies of quantitative parameters of virus excretion and transmission in pigs and cattle experimentally infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus. , 2003, Journal of comparative pathology.

[15]  R. Tinline Lee Wave Hypothesis for the Initial Pattern of Spread during the 1967-68 Foot and Mouth Epizootic , 1970, Nature.