A lower bound for the velocity of quantum communications in the preferred frame

Abstract An EPR experiment with polarized entangled photons is performed to test the Eberhard model. According to the Eberhard model, quantum correlations between space-like separated events are due to a superluminal communication signal propagating in a preferred frame. The coincidences between entangled photons passing through two polarizers aligned along a East–West axis are measured as a function of time during 21 sidereal days. No deviation from the predictions of the Quantum Theory is observed. Tacking into account for the experimental uncertainties, we infer that, if a preferred frame for superluminal signals exists which moves at velocity v → with respect to the Earth, the modulus of the velocity of quantum communications in this frame has to be greater than v t ≃ 0.6 × 10 4 c for v 0.1 c and for any arbitrary direction of v → .

[1]  Wolfgang Tittel,et al.  The speed of quantum information and the preferred frame: analysis of experimental data , 2000, quant-ph/0007008.

[2]  Philippe Grangier,et al.  Quantum physics: Count them all , 2001, Nature.

[3]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[4]  B. Hiley The Undivided Universe , 1993 .

[5]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection , 2001, Nature.

[6]  Edo Waks,et al.  Ultra-bright source of polarization-entangled photons , 1999 .

[7]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[8]  A. Aspect Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever , 1999, Nature.

[9]  M. Horne,et al.  Experimental Consequences of Objective Local Theories , 1974 .

[10]  Matt Visser,et al.  Faster-than-c Signals, Special Relativity, and Causality , 2002 .

[11]  Matison,et al.  Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories , 1972 .

[12]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[13]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[14]  A. Zeilinger Testing bell's inequalities with periodic switching , 1986 .

[15]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Reply to the "Comment on: Testing the speed of 'spooky action at a distance' " , 2008, 0810.4607.

[16]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Experimental test of quantum nonlocality in three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement , 2000, Nature.

[17]  M. Genovese Research on hidden variable theories: A review of recent progresses , 2005, quant-ph/0701071.

[18]  N. Gisin,et al.  Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart , 1998, quant-ph/9806043.

[19]  Paul G. Kwiat,et al.  Phase-compensated ultra-bright source of entangled photons: erratum , 2007 .

[20]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[21]  P. Eberhard A Realistic Model for Quantum Theory With a Locality Property , 1989 .

[22]  C. Moller,et al.  The Theory of Relativity , 1953, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  J. Mitchard The Theory of Relativity , 1921, Nature.

[24]  Wolfram Schommers,et al.  Quantum Theory and Pictures of Reality , 1989 .

[25]  E. Jeffrey,et al.  Phase-compensated ultra-bright source of entangled photons , 2005, 2005 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[26]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.