Model-based parameter optimization of a fused deposition modelling process

The aim of this research was to develop mathematical models of a fused deposition modelling process by two different approaches. These models were used to predict the process behavior, to derive optimal process parameters and also to compare these different modelling approaches in terms of model quality. Four subordinate targets were defined. For each, two different modelling approaches were applied. First, black box models were established using design of experiments (DoE). Second, white box models were derived from a theoretical analysis of the process. Afterwards, three different parameter optimizations were applied for the considered fused deposition modelling system to evaluate and compare the prediction accuracy of the models.

[1]  Seok-Hee Lee,et al.  Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[2]  Jack G. Zhou,et al.  PARAMETRIC PROCESS OPTIMIZATION TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY OF RAPID PROTOTYPED STEREOLITHOGRAPHY PARTS , 2000 .

[3]  Tirthankar Dasgupta,et al.  Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three-dimensional printing processes , 2015 .

[4]  Wolfgang Kaiser,et al.  Kunststoffchemie für Ingenieure: Von der Synthese bis zur Anwendung , 2007 .

[5]  FrankDaniel,et al.  An Investigation of Cause-and-Effect Relationships Within a 3D-Printing System and the Applicability of Optimum Printing Parameters from Experimental Models to Different Printing Jobs , 2015 .

[6]  K.K.B. Hon,et al.  Improving Stereolithography Part Accuracy for Industrial Applications , 2001 .

[7]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .

[8]  Jonathan Edgar,et al.  “Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing”, 2nd Edition , 2015 .

[9]  Dar-Yuan Chang,et al.  Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process , 2011 .

[10]  Tim Caffrey,et al.  Wohlers report 2013 : additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry : annual worldwide progress report , 2013 .

[11]  J. Bortz,et al.  Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler , 2006 .

[12]  Robert C. Pennington,et al.  Significant factors in the dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling , 2005 .

[13]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling , 2004 .

[14]  K. Leong,et al.  Investigation of the mechanical properties and porosity relationships in fused deposition modelling‐fabricated porous structures , 2006 .

[15]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Usage of accuracy models in stereolithography process planning , 2000 .

[16]  U. Lindemann,et al.  Individualisierte Produkte - Komplexität beherrschen in Entwicklung und Produktion , 2006 .

[17]  S. Arunachalam,et al.  Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling , 2001 .

[18]  Olaf Diegel,et al.  Wohlers Report 2018: 3D printing and additive manufacturing state of the industry: Annual Worldwide Progress Report , 2017 .

[19]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Parametric error modeling and software error compensation for rapid prototyping , 2003 .