Prognostic impact of Framingham heart failure criteria in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

This study aims to assess prognostic impact of Framingham criteria for heart failure (FC‐HF) in patients with stable heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).

[1]  J. Daubert,et al.  Importance of structural heart disease and diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction assessed according to the ESC guidelines - A substudy in the Ka (Karolinska) Ren (Rennes) study. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  L. Lund,et al.  Associations With and Prognostic and Discriminatory Role of N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Heart Failure With Preserved Versus Mid-range Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction. , 2018, Journal of cardiac failure.

[3]  Roland A Matsouaka,et al.  Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: 5-Year Outcomes. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  Akshay S. Desai,et al.  Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Rationale and Design of the PARAGON-HF Trial. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[5]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure , 2016, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[6]  L. Lund,et al.  New echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients presenting with heart failure and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a subanalysis of the Ka (Karolinska) Ren (Rennes) Study , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[7]  J. Daubert,et al.  Association between cardiovascular vs. non‐cardiovascular co‐morbidities and outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , 2014, European journal of heart failure.

[8]  J. Daubert,et al.  Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction included in the Karolinska Rennes (KaRen) study. , 2014, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[9]  J. Daubert,et al.  Rationale and design of the Karolinska‐Rennes (KaRen) prospective study of dyssynchrony in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction , 2009, European journal of heart failure.

[10]  Serguei V. S. Pakhomov,et al.  Systolic and diastolic heart failure in the community. , 2006, JAMA.

[11]  Peter C Austin,et al.  Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  V. Roger,et al.  Trends in prevalence and outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  K. Swedberg,et al.  Differences between patients with a preserved and a depressed left ventricular function: a report from the EuroHeart Failure Survey. , 2004, European heart journal.

[14]  M. J. Lenzena,et al.  Differences between patients with a preserved and a depressed left ventricular function: a report from the EuroHeart Failure Survey , 2004 .

[15]  T. Rector.  Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure : Content, reliability, and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire , 1987 .

[16]  W. Kannel,et al.  The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.