Network Ecology and Adolescent Social Structure

Adolescent societies—whether arising from weak, short-term classroom friendships or from close, long-term friendships—exhibit various levels of network clustering, segregation, and hierarchy. Some are rank-ordered caste systems and others are flat, cliquish worlds. Explaining the source of such structural variation remains a challenge, however, because global network features are generally treated as the agglomeration of micro-level tie-formation mechanisms, namely balance, homophily, and dominance. How do the same micro-mechanisms generate significant variation in global network structures? To answer this question we propose and test a network ecological theory that specifies the ways features of organizational environments moderate the expression of tie-formation processes, thereby generating variability in global network structures across settings. We develop this argument using longitudinal friendship data on schools (Add Health study) and classrooms (Classroom Engagement study), and by extending exponential random graph models to the study of multiple societies over time.

[1]  Andrew Smolen,et al.  The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health) Sibling Pairs Data , 2012, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[2]  Robert Crosnoe,et al.  Research on Adolescence in the Twenty-First Century. , 2011, Annual review of sociology.

[3]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence , 2011, Soc. Networks.

[4]  David R Schaefer,et al.  Health and the Structure of Adolescent Social Networks , 2010, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  Kevin Lewis,et al.  Beyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.

[6]  J. Eccles,et al.  An Ecological View of Schools and Development , 2010 .

[7]  Kathryn M. LaFontana,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Priority of Perceived Status in Childhood and Adolescence. , 2010 .

[8]  K. Leithwood,et al.  A Review of Empirical Evidence About School Size Effects: A Policy Perspective , 2009 .

[9]  S. Goodreau,et al.  Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks* , 2009, Demography.

[10]  Martina Morris,et al.  ergm: A Package to Fit, Simulate and Diagnose Exponential-Family Models for Networks. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[11]  Martina Morris,et al.  statnet: Software Tools for the Representation, Visualization, Analysis and Simulation of Network Data. , 2008, Journal of statistical software.

[12]  Kenneth A. Frank,et al.  The Social Dynamics of Mathematics Coursetaking in High School1 , 2008, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  Stuart Soroka,et al.  When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions , 2008 .

[14]  James Moody,et al.  Features of groups and status hierarchies in girls' and boys' early adolescent peer networks. , 2007, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[15]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[16]  J. Krause,et al.  Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  Garry Robins,et al.  An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks , 2007, Soc. Networks.

[18]  S. Wulff SAS for Mixed Models , 2007 .

[19]  Katherine Faust,et al.  Networks and Contexts: Variation in the Structure of Social Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  D. Hunter,et al.  Inference in Curved Exponential Family Models for Networks , 2006 .

[21]  Marijtje A. J. van Duijn,et al.  The Multilevel p2 Model , 2006 .

[22]  Walter Doyle,et al.  Ecological Approaches to Classroom Management , 2006 .

[23]  Andrew Abbott,et al.  Linked Ecologies: States and Universities as Environments for Professions* , 2005 .

[24]  Robert Crosnoe,et al.  School Size and the Interpersonal Side of Education: An Examination of Race/Ethnicity and Organizational Context* , 2004 .

[25]  C. Muller,et al.  Body Mass Index, Academic Achievement, and School Context: Examining the Educational Experiences of Adolescents at Risk of Obesity∗ , 2004, Journal of health and social behavior.

[26]  M. V. van Aken,et al.  Attachment in Adolescence: , 2004 .

[27]  K. Frank,et al.  Peer Context and the Consequences of Adolescent Drinking , 2004 .

[28]  Murray Milner,et al.  Freaks, Geeks, and Cool Kids: American Teenagers, Schools, and the Culture of Consumption , 2004 .

[29]  Toni Watt Are Small Schools and Private Schools Better for Adolescents' Emotional Adjustment? , 2003 .

[30]  R. Sampson,et al.  ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research , 2002 .

[31]  Rashmita S. Mistry,et al.  Economic disadvantage, family dynamics, and adolescent enrollment in higher education , 2002 .

[32]  J. Nonnemaker,et al.  Promoting school connectedness: evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. , 2002, The Journal of school health.

[33]  Martin R. West,et al.  Class-Size Effects in School Systems Around the World: Evidence from Between-Grade Variation in Timss , 2002 .

[34]  Roger V. Gould The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test1 , 2002, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Daniel A. McFarland Student Resistance: How the Formal and Informal Organization of Classrooms Facilitate Everyday Forms of Student Defiance1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  J. Moody Race, School Integration, and Friendship Segregation in America1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Glen H. Elder,et al.  Students' Attachment and Academic Engagement: The Role of Race and Ethnicity. , 2001 .

[38]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[39]  S. Brint Gemeinschaft Revisited: A Critique and Reconstruction of the Community Concept* , 2001 .

[40]  P. Pattison,et al.  Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks , 2001 .

[41]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Adolescent Development , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[42]  Stephen B. Plank,et al.  Finding One's Place: Teaching Styles and Peer Relations in Diverse Classrooms , 2000 .

[43]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[44]  P. Erwin Friendship in childhood and adolescence , 1998 .

[45]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs andp , 1996 .

[46]  J. Cotterell Social Networks and Social Influences in Adolescence , 1996 .

[47]  Scott D. Gest,et al.  The structure and coherence of competence from childhood through adolescence. , 1995, Child development.

[48]  P. Giordano,et al.  The Wider Circle of Friends in Adolescence , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[49]  R B Cairns,et al.  Friendships and social networks in childhood and adolescence: fluidity, reliability, and interrelations. , 1995, Child development.

[50]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[51]  James S. Coleman,et al.  A vision for sociology , 1994 .

[52]  D. Krackhardt Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations , 1994 .

[53]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[54]  Ann Locke Davidson,et al.  Students' Multiple Worlds: Negotiating the Boundaries of Family, Peer, and School Cultures. , 1991 .

[55]  Donna Eder,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF GOSSIP: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ON COLLECTIVE EXPRESSION AMONG ADOLESCENTS* , 1991 .

[56]  C. Ridgeway,et al.  Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. , 1989 .

[57]  S. Stodolsky The Subject Matters: Classroom Activity in Math and Social Studies , 1988 .

[58]  Cynthia Parsons,et al.  The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace , 1985 .

[59]  Eugene C. Johnsen,et al.  Network macrostructure models for the Davis-Leinhardt set of empirical sociomatrices , 1985 .

[60]  Arthur G. Powell,et al.  The Shopping Mall High School: Winners and Losers in the Educational Marketplace. , 1985 .

[61]  Donna Eder,et al.  The Cycle of Popularity: Interpersonal Relations among Female Adolescents. , 1985 .

[62]  M. McPherson An Ecology of Affiliation , 1983 .

[63]  Nancy L. Karweit,et al.  Friends in School: Patterns of Selection and Influence in Secondary Schools , 1983 .

[64]  Maureen T. Hallinan,et al.  Classroom Racial Composition and Children's Friendships , 1982 .

[65]  Steve Rytina,et al.  The Arithmetic of Social Relations: The Interplay of Category and Network , 1982, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  J. F. Andersen,et al.  The Importance of Perceived Homophily, Level of Uncertainty, Feeling Good, Safety, and Self-Disclosure in Interpersonal Relationships. , 1980 .

[68]  M. Ravindranathan,et al.  STRUCTURAL EFFECTS I , 1977 .

[69]  B. H. Mayhew,,et al.  Size and the Density of Interaction in Human Aggregates , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[70]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[71]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[72]  A. B. Sørensen Organizational Differentiation of Students and Educational Opportunity. , 1970 .

[73]  S. Leinhardt,et al.  The Structure of Positive Interpersonal Relations in Small Groups. , 1967 .

[74]  D. Dunphy The social structure of urban adolescent peer groups. , 1963 .

[75]  D. Offer,et al.  The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of the Teenager and Its Impact on Education. , 1962 .

[76]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[77]  C. W. Gordon,et al.  The Social System of the High School , 1958 .

[78]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[79]  T. Neithercott Peer power. , 2014, Diabetes forecast.

[80]  S. Oishi Socioecological psychology. , 2014, Annual review of psychology.

[81]  T. Stark Integration in schools. A process perspective on students' interethnic attitudes and interpersonal relationships , 2011 .

[82]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics , 2010, Soc. Networks.

[83]  Laura D. Hanish,et al.  Social network analysis and children's peer relationships , 2007 .

[84]  J. Smetana,et al.  Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[85]  Marijtje A. J. van Duijn,et al.  A Random Effects Model for the Analysis of Multiple Social Networks , 2006 .

[86]  L. DeFiore Catholic Schools and the Common Good. , 2006 .

[87]  M. Handcock Center for Studies in Demography and Ecology Assessing Degeneracy in Statistical Models of Social Networks , 2005 .

[88]  Neighbourhood-based models for social networks , 2002 .

[89]  W. C. Carter,et al.  Placing Friendship in Context: Foci of activity as changing contexts for friendship , 1999 .

[90]  Phillip R. Shaver,et al.  Handbook of attachment : theory, research, and clinical applications , 1999 .

[91]  Penelope Eckert,et al.  Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School , 1989 .

[92]  M. Hallinan The process of friendship formation , 1978 .

[93]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[94]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.