Chemotaxis and random motility in unsteady chemoattractant fields: a computational study.

We discuss a generic computational model which captures the effects of transient chemoattractant concentration on the chemotactic motility of individual cells. The model solves the appropriate unsteady chemoattractant transport equation using finite differences, while simultaneously executing biased random walks representing individual cells. The simulations were implemented for a 2D homogeneous domain, and two case studies were considered. In the first case study, we consider a single-point source at the origin of the domain which produces chemoattractant, while other cells execute biased random walks toward this point source. We observe that for continuous chemoattractant production, chemoattractant diffusivity has no effect on cell motility, as measured by the mean of time to reach the source. However, in the case of pulsed random production with a specific average duty cycle, the mean time-to-contact is generally minimal with respect to chemoattractant diffusivity over a moderate range of diffusivities. In the second case study, two mobile cells which simultaneously secrete chemoattractant are initially placed a certain distance apart and are then allowed to execute biased random walks. Our model shows that a pulsed random protocol for chemoattractant production facilitates the two cells "finding" one another compared to continuous production. From this case study we also learn that there exists a range of moderate chemoattractant diffusivities for which the mean time-to-contact is minimal when cells both produce/detect chemoattractant and chemotactically migrate. Using these case studies, we discuss how transience in chemoattractant concentration becomes important in characterizing the effectiveness of chemotaxis.

[1]  L. Segel,et al.  Model for chemotaxis. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  M. Markus,et al.  Simulation of vessel morphogenesis using cellular automata. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[3]  B. Sleeman,et al.  Tumour induced angiogenesis as a reinforced random walk: Modelling capillary network formation without endothelial cell proliferation , 2002 .

[4]  Douglas A. Lauffenburger,et al.  Transport models for chemotactic cell populations based on individual cell behavior , 1989 .

[5]  Richard B. Dickinson,et al.  Transport Equations and Indices for Random and Biased Cell Migration Based on Single Cell Properties , 1995, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[6]  M Scalerandi,et al.  Diffusion with evolving sources and competing sinks: development of angiogenesis. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Analysis of the roles of microvessel endothelial cell random motility and chemotaxis in angiogenesis. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  Zigmond Sh Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. , 1977 .

[9]  Gargi Maheshwari,et al.  Deconstructing (and reconstructing) cell migration , 1998, Microscopy research and technique.

[10]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Temporal and spatial regulation of chemotaxis. , 2002, Developmental cell.

[11]  M. Chaplain,et al.  Mathematical Modelling of Angiogenesis , 2000, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[12]  B O Palsson,et al.  Effective intercellular communication distances are determined by the relative time constants for cyto/chemokine secretion and diffusion. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Paul Gordon,et al.  Nonsymmetric Difference Equations , 1965 .

[14]  W. Alt Biased random walk models for chemotaxis and related diffusion approximations , 1980, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  H. Othmer,et al.  A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  F. Yuan,et al.  Numerical simulations of angiogenesis in the cornea. , 2001, Microvascular research.

[17]  K Zygourakis,et al.  Quantification and regulation of cell migration. , 1996, Tissue engineering.

[18]  Alexander R. A. Anderson,et al.  A mathematical analysis of a model for capillary network formation in the absence of endothelial cell proliferation , 1999 .

[19]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Bioengineering models of cell signaling. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[20]  H G Othmer,et al.  A continuum analysis of the chemotactic signal seen by Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  L. Preziosi,et al.  Modeling the early stages of vascular network assembly , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  A. R. Gourlay,et al.  Hopscotch: a Fast Second-order Partial Differential Equation Solver , 1970 .

[23]  Alexander R. A. Anderson,et al.  A Mathematical Model for Capillary Network Formation in the Absence of Endothelial Cell Proliferation , 1998 .

[24]  Takuji Nishimura,et al.  Mersenne twister: a 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator , 1998, TOMC.

[25]  Hans G. Othmer,et al.  Aggregation, Blowup, and Collapse: The ABC's of Taxis in Reinforced Random Walks , 1997, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[26]  P. Devreotes Dictyostelium discoideum: a model system for cell-cell interactions in development. , 1989, Science.

[27]  R. Auerbach,et al.  Tumor-induced neovascularization in the mouse eye. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Inversely correlated cycles in speed and turning in an ameba: an oscillatory model of cell locomotion. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[29]  James G. Uber,et al.  Evaluation of Hopscotch Method for Transient Ground-Water Flow , 2000 .

[30]  G. Pinder,et al.  Numerical solution of partial differential equations in science and engineering , 1982 .