Linear binocular combination of responses to contrast modulation: contrast-weighted summation in first- and second-order vision.

UNLABELLED Binocular combination for first-order (luminance-defined) stimuli has been widely studied, but we know rather little about this binocular process for spatial modulations of contrast (second-order stimuli). We used phase-matching and amplitude-matching tasks to assess binocular combination of second-order phase and modulation depth simultaneously. With fixed modulation in one eye, we found that binocularly perceived phase was shifted, and perceived amplitude increased almost linearly as modulation depth in the other eye increased. At larger disparities, the phase shift was larger and the amplitude change was smaller. The degree of interocular correlation of the carriers had no influence. These results can be explained by an initial extraction of the contrast envelopes before binocular combination (consistent with the lack of dependence on carrier correlation) followed by a weighted linear summation of second-order modulations in which the weights (gains) for each eye are driven by the first-order carrier contrasts as previously found for first-order binocular combination. Perceived modulation depth fell markedly with increasing phase disparity unlike previous findings that perceived first-order contrast was almost independent of phase disparity. We present a simple revision to a widely used interocular gain-control theory that unifies first- and second-order binocular summation with a single principle--contrast--weighted summation-and we further elaborate the model for first-order combination. CONCLUSION Second-order combination is controlled by first-order contrast.

[1]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Sensitivity to modulations of luminance and contrast in visual white noise: separate mechanisms with similar behaviour , 1999, Vision Research.

[2]  Yifeng Zhou,et al.  Contrast gain-control in stereo depth and cyclopean contrast perception. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[3]  B. Mansouri,et al.  Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia , 2008, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[5]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast , 2012, Vision Research.

[6]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Interocular masking and summation indicate two stages of divisive contrast gain control , 2005 .

[7]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[8]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[9]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Hess,et al.  Binocular Combination of Second-Order Stimuli , 2014, PloS one.

[11]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Motion: the long and short of it. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[12]  Michael S. Landy,et al.  Detection and Discrimination , 1991 .

[13]  W. Levelt,et al.  BINOCULAR BRIGHTNESS AVERAGING AND CONTOUR INFORMATION. , 1965, British journal of psychology.

[14]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—II. Quadratic summation , 1984, Vision Research.

[16]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Human Perception of Objects: Early Visual Processing of Spatial Form Defined by Luminance, Color, Texture, Motion, and Binocular Disparity , 2001 .

[17]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Sensitivity to contrast modulation: the spatial frequency dependence of second-order vision , 2003, Vision Research.

[18]  G. Sperling,et al.  The dimensionality of texture-defined motion: a single channel theory , 1993, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to contrast modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[20]  Dennis M Levi,et al.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[21]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[22]  Mark A Georgeson,et al.  Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges , 2014, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Non-Fourier Cortical Processes in Texture, Form, and Motion Perception , 1999 .

[24]  Hiroki Tanaka,et al.  Neural Basis for Stereopsis from Second-Order Contrast Cues , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  G. R. Engel,et al.  Tests of a model of binocular brightness. , 1970, Canadian journal of psychology.

[26]  B. Mansouri,et al.  Binocular influences on global motion processing in the human visual system , 2007, Vision Research.

[27]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  Is the site of non-linear filtering in stereopsis before or after binocular combination? , 1996, Vision Research.

[28]  G. Sperling,et al.  Drift-balanced random stimuli: a general basis for studying non-Fourier motion perception. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  G Sperling,et al.  Two motion perception mechanisms revealed through distance-driven reversal of apparent motion. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[32]  R. Hess,et al.  The Effect of Unilateral Mean Luminance on Binocular Combination in normal and amblyopic vision , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[33]  Jiawei Zhou,et al.  Deficient binocular combination reveals mechanisms of anisometropic amblyopia: signal attenuation and interocular inhibition. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[34]  H. Lu,et al.  Visual search by action category. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[35]  George Sperling,et al.  A gain-control theory of binocular combination. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. Hess,et al.  Interocular suppression in amblyopia for global orientation processing. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[37]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Level and mechanisms of perceptual learning: Learning first-order luminance and second-order texture objects , 2006, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Landy,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation to first- and second-order patterns in human visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  Zhong-Lin Lu,et al.  Contrast and Phase Combination in Binocular Vision , 2010, PloS one.

[40]  S. Anstis,et al.  Nonlinear combination of luminance excursions during flicker, simultaneous contrast, afterimages and binocular fusion , 1998, Vision Research.

[41]  Jiawei Zhou,et al.  Stereopsis and mean luminance. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[42]  C. Baker.  Central neural mechanisms for detecting second-order motion , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  Robert F Hess,et al.  A Compact Clinical Instrument for Quantifying Suppression , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[44]  Engel Gr,et al.  Tests of a model of binocular brightness. , 1970 .

[45]  Emily A Cooper,et al.  Assessment of OLED displays for vision research. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[46]  Robert J Summers,et al.  Neuronal convergence in early contrast vision: binocular summation is followed by response nonlinearity and area summation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[47]  N. Graham,et al.  Investigating simple and complex mechanisms in texture segregation using the speed-accuracy tradeoff method , 1995, Vision Research.

[48]  STANLEY A. KLEIN,et al.  The Adjacent Pixel Nonlinearity: Problems and Solutions , 1996, Vision Research.

[49]  M. Georgeson,et al.  The Effect of Interocular Phase Difference on Perceived Contrast , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  R. Hess,et al.  Low spatial frequencies are suppressively masked across spatial scale, orientation, field position, and eye of origin. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[51]  Tandra Ghose,et al.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition. , 2013, Journal of vision.