Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress

Abstract In New Zealand English there is a merger-in-progress of the near and square diphthongs. This paper investigates the consequences of this merger for speech perception. We report on an experiment involving the speech of four New Zealanders—two male, and two female. All four speakers make a distinction between near and square . Participants took part in a binary forced-choice identification task which included 20 near / square items produced by each of the four speakers. All participants were presented with identical auditory stimuli. However the visual presentation differed. Across four conditions, we paired each voice with a series of photos—an “older” looking photo, a “younger” looking photo, a “middle class” photo and a “working class” photo. The middle and working class photos were, in fact, photos of the same people, in different attire. In a fifth condition, participants completed the task with no associated photos. At the end of the identification task, each participant was recorded reading a near/square wordlist, containing the same items as appeared in the perception task. The results show that a wide range of factors influence accuracy in the perception task. These include participant-specific characteristics, word-specific characteristics, context-specific characteristics, and perceived speaker characteristics. We argue that, taken together, the results provide strong support for exemplar-based models of speech perception, in which exemplars are socially indexed.

[1]  Keith Johnson,et al.  Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Margaret Maclagan,et al.  Out of the AIR and into the EAR: Another view of the New Zealand diphthong merger , 1996, Language Variation and Change.

[3]  Paul Foulkes,et al.  The social life of phonetics and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[4]  Mark A. Pitt,et al.  Using pronunciation data as a starting point in modeling word recognition , 2003 .

[5]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[6]  Allan Bell,et al.  On shear markets and sharing sheep: The merger of EAR and AIR diphthongs in New Zealand English , 1992, Language Variation and Change.

[7]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[8]  Elizabeth A. Strand,et al.  Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception , 1999 .

[9]  Jonathan Harrington,et al.  An acoustic comparison between New Zealand and Australian English vowels , 1998 .

[10]  Elizabeth A. Strand.  Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception , 1999 .

[11]  Margaret E. Winters.  Diachrony within synchrony , 1992 .

[12]  Paul Warren,et al.  Chapter ? ? The loci of sound change effects in recognition and perception , 2005 .

[13]  Norman R. French,et al.  THE FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF SPEECH SOUNDS IN SPOKEN ENGLISH , 1929 .

[14]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[15]  C. L. Olson.  On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance. , 1976 .

[16]  A. C. Gimson,et al.  An introduction to the pronunciation of English , 1991 .

[17]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment , 1992 .

[18]  J. Pierrehumbert.  Why phonological constraints are so coarse-grained , 2001 .

[19]  No Value.  Proceedings of the 14th international congress of phonetic sciences , 2000 .

[20]  H. Savin.  Word‐Frequency Effect and Errors in the Perception of Speech , 1963 .

[21]  Jen Hay,et al.  Using Sound Change to Explore the Mental Lexicon , 2006 .

[22]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[23]  June Luchjenbroers.  “How do you know she’s a woman?” Features, prototypes and category stress in Turkish KADIN and KIZ , 2006 .

[24]  Margaret Maclagan,et al.  'Capturing a Sound Change': A Real Time Study Over 15 Years of the NEAR/SQUARE Diphthong Merger in New Zealand English , 2001 .

[25]  Margaret. Batterham.  The apparent merger of the front centering diphthongs - EAR and AIR - in New Zealand English , 1999 .

[26]  Koenraad Kuiper,et al.  New Zealand English , 2000 .

[27]  Alice Faber,et al.  Phonation differences and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[28]  Warwick B. Elley,et al.  The Elley-Irving Socio-economic Index: 2001 Census revision. , 2003 .

[29]  Peter Davis,et al.  The New Zealand Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status (NZSEI) , 1997 .

[30]  J. Pittam,et al.  Pax Americana? Accent attitudinal evaluations in New Zealand, Australia and America , 2001 .

[31]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[32]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[33]  Paul Warren,et al.  Word recognition and sound merger : the case of the front-centering diphthongs in NZ English , 2003 .

[34]  John C. Wells,et al.  Accents of English , 1982 .

[35]  J. Chambers,et al.  The handbook of language variation and change , 2003 .

[36]  W. Labov.  Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[37]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast , 2000 .

[38]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  Notes on New Zealand English Phonetics and Phonology , 1986 .