The Aggressive Phenotype Revisited: Utilization of Higher‐Risk Liver Allografts

Organ shortage has led to increased utilization of higher risk liver allografts. In kidneys, aggressive center‐level use of one type of higher risk graft clustered with aggressive use of other types. In this study, we explored center‐level behavior in liver utilization. We aggregated national liver transplant recipient data between 2005 and 2009 to the center‐level, assigning each center an aggressiveness score based on relative utilization of higher risk livers. Aggressive centers had significantly more patients reaching high MELDs (RR 2.19, 2.33 and 2.28 for number of patients reaching MELD > 20, MELD > 25 and MELD > 30, p < 0.001), a higher organ shortage ratio (RR 1.51, 1.60 and 1.51 for number of patients reaching MELD > 20, MELD > 25 and MELD > 30 divided by number of organs recovered at the OPO, p < 0.04), and were clustered within various geographic regions, particularly regions 2, 3 and 9. Median MELD at transplant was similar between aggressive and nonaggressive centers, but average annual transplant volume was significantly higher at aggressive centers (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.47–3.51, p < 0.001). In cluster analysis, there were no obvious phenotypic patterns among centers with intermediate levels of aggressiveness. In conclusion, highwaitlist disease severity, geographic differences in organ availability, and transplant volume are the main factors associated with the aggressive utilization of higher risk livers.

[1]  J. A. Berger,et al.  The Aggressive Phenotype: Center‐Level Patterns in the Utilization of Suboptimal Kidneys , 2012, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[2]  Johnny C. Hong,et al.  Current status of donation after cardiac death liver transplantation , 2010, Current opinion in organ transplantation.

[3]  D. Segev,et al.  Listing for Expanded Criteria Donor Kidneys in Older Adults and Those with Predicted Benefit , 2010, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[4]  T. Koepsell,et al.  Survival after orthotopic liver transplantation: The impact of antibody against hepatitis B core antigen in the donor , 2009, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[5]  P. Kwo,et al.  No difference in clinical transplant outcomes for local and imported liver allografts , 2009, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[6]  Georgios Tsoulfas,et al.  The cumulative effects of cold ischemic time and older donor age on liver graft survival. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[7]  L. Kucirka,et al.  Effect Modification in Liver Allografts With Prolonged Cold Ischemic Time , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[8]  P. Thuluvath,et al.  Minimizing risk associated with elderly liver donors by matching to preferred recipients , 2007, Hepatology.

[9]  M. Büchler,et al.  Utilization of extended donor criteria in liver transplantation: a comprehensive review of the literature. , 2007, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[10]  H. Friess,et al.  Extended donor criteria have no negative impact on early outcome after liver transplantation: a single-center multivariate analysis. , 2007, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  P. Kwo,et al.  Use of Extended Criteria Livers Decreases Wait Time for Liver Transplantation Without Adversely Impacting Posttransplant Survival , 2006, Annals of surgery.

[12]  C. Kin,et al.  Extended-donor criteria liver allografts. , 2006, Seminars in liver disease.

[13]  J. Bragg-Gresham,et al.  Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index , 2006, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[14]  A. Matarranz,et al.  Donors older than 70 years in liver transplantation. , 2005, Transplantation proceedings.

[15]  C. Kin,et al.  Utilization of Extended Donor Criteria Liver Allografts Maximizes Donor Use and Patient Access to Liver Transplantation , 2005, Annals of surgery.

[16]  B. Gridelli,et al.  Acceptance of marginal liver donors increases the volume of liver transplant: early results of a single-center experience. , 2005, Transplantation proceedings.

[17]  T. Therneau,et al.  Predicting Survival among Patients Listed for Liver Transplantation: An Assessment of Serial MELD Measurements , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[18]  R. Wiesner,et al.  MELD and Other Factors Associated with Survival after Liver Transplantation , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[19]  J. Trotter,et al.  MELD scores of liver transplant recipients according to size of waiting list: impact of organ allocation and patient outcomes. , 2004, JAMA.

[20]  G. Tisone,et al.  Marginal donors in liver transplantation. , 2004, Transplantation proceedings.

[21]  G. Klintmalm,et al.  Liver and intestine transplantation , 2004, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[22]  W. Kim,et al.  MELD score as a predictor of pretransplant and posttransplant survival in OPTN/UNOS status 1 patients , 2004, Hepatology.

[23]  A. Harper,et al.  The sickest first? Disparities with model for end‐stage liver disease‐based organ allocation: One region's experience , 2003, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[24]  R. Busuttil,et al.  The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation , 2003, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[25]  R. Wiesner,et al.  Liver and intestine transplantation , 2003, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[26]  J. Gornbein,et al.  Preoperative factors associated with outcome and their impact on resource use in 1148 consecutive primary liver transplants. , 2001, Transplantation.

[27]  M. Abecassis,et al.  Body mass index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in living liver donors , 2001, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[28]  J. Roberts,et al.  The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Hoofnagle,et al.  Donor age and outcome of liver transplantation , 1996, Hepatology.

[30]  J. Hoofnagle,et al.  Fulminant Hepatic Failure : Summary of a Workshop , 2017 .

[31]  R. Wiesner,et al.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. , 2003, Gastroenterology.

[32]  B. Dousset,et al.  The influence of cold ischemia time on biliary complications following liver transplantation. , 1994, Journal of hepatology.

[33]  J. Alexander,et al.  The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome. , 1991, Transplantation.