SimG: An Alignment Based Method for Evaluating the Similarity of Small Molecules and Binding Sites
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Nicolas Moitessier,et al. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[2] Ajay N. Jain. Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[3] J. Bajorath,et al. Quo vadis, virtual screening? A comprehensive survey of prospective applications. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[4] Michael Nilges,et al. Comparative Evaluation of 3D Virtual Ligand Screening Methods: Impact of the Molecular Alignment on Enrichment , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[5] Y. Martin,et al. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] James L. Melville,et al. Better than Random? The Chemotype Enrichment Problem , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] R. Mcweeny,et al. Shape and similarity: two aspects of molecular recognition , 1991 .
[8] David S. Goodsell,et al. Distributed automated docking of flexible ligands to proteins: Parallel applications of AutoDock 2.4 , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[9] P. Hawkins,et al. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[10] A. Gorse. Diversity in medicinal chemistry space. , 2006, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[11] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[12] Robert D Clark,et al. Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors. , 1996, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[13] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[14] Jude W. Shavlik,et al. Spherical-harmonic decomposition for molecular recognition in electron-density maps , 2009, Int. J. Data Min. Bioinform..
[15] Christopher I. Bayly,et al. Evaluating Virtual Screening Methods: Good and Bad Metrics for the "Early Recognition" Problem , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[16] W. Graham Richards,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition to search compound databases for similar molecular shapes , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..
[17] B. Fan,et al. Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: From theory to applications , 2006, Molecular Diversity.
[18] Hanna Geppert,et al. Current Trends in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening: Molecular Representations, Data Mining Methods, New Application Areas, and Performance Evaluation , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[19] Molecular shape, dimensions, and shape selective catalysis , 2003 .
[20] Anthony Nicholls,et al. What do we know and when do we know it? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[21] Terry R. Stouch,et al. The errors of our ways: taking account of error in computer-aided drug design to build confidence intervals for our next 25 years , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[22] G. Klebe,et al. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.
[23] Robert D. Clark,et al. Managing bias in ROC curves , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[24] Honglin Li,et al. A novel, customizable and optimizable parameter method using spherical harmonics for molecular shape similarity comparisons , 2011, Journal of Molecular Modeling.
[25] Takayuki Kotani,et al. Rapid Evaluation of Molecular Shape Similarity Index Using Pairwise Calculation of the Nearest Atomic Distances , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[26] Tom Fawcett,et al. An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..
[27] Lazaros Mavridis,et al. Toward High Throughput 3D Virtual Screening Using Spherical Harmonic Surface Representations , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[28] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.
[29] Tjelvar S. G. Olsson,et al. The good, the bad and the twisted: a survey of ligand geometry in protein crystal structures , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.
[30] Janet M. Thornton,et al. Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons , 2005, Bioinform..
[31] Lora Mak,et al. An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[32] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Comparison of Topological, Shape, and Docking Methods in Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[33] Pieter F. W. Stouten,et al. Fast prediction and visualization of protein binding pockets with PASS , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[34] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[35] Jie Liang,et al. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..
[36] Pedro J Ballester,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition: method and applications. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.
[37] Jorge M. C. Marques,et al. How Different Are Two Chemical Structures? , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[38] J. A. Grant,et al. A Gaussian Description of Molecular Shape , 1995 .
[39] Andreas Zell,et al. Optimal assignment methods for ligand-based virtual screening , 2009, J. Cheminformatics.
[40] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking using shape descriptors , 1992 .
[41] J. A. Grant,et al. A fast method of molecular shape comparison: A simple application of a Gaussian description of molecular shape , 1996, J. Comput. Chem..
[42] Obdulia Rabal,et al. APIF: A New Interaction Fingerprint Based on Atom Pairs and Its Application to Virtual Screening , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[43] J. Andrew Grant,et al. Small Molecule Shape-Fingerprints , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[44] Andreas Bender,et al. How Similar Are Similarity Searching Methods? A Principal Component Analysis of Molecular Descriptor Space , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[45] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[46] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[47] Andrew C. Good,et al. Utilization of Gaussian functions for the rapid evaluation of molecular similarity , 1992, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[48] Ajay N. Jain,et al. Molecular Shape and Medicinal Chemistry: A Perspective , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[49] N. Nikolova,et al. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, LUMO energy ± The Lowest Unoccupied Molecular Orbital (LUMO) , 2022 .
[50] R. Glen,et al. Molecular similarity: a key technique in molecular informatics. , 2004, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.
[51] David W. Ritchie,et al. Comparison of Ligand-Based and Receptor-Based Virtual Screening of HIV Entry Inhibitors for the CXCR4 and CCR5 Receptors Using 3D Ligand Shape Matching and Ligand-Receptor Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[52] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Computational methods for biomolecular docking. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.
[53] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[54] Ruben Abagyan,et al. Prediction of the binding energy for small molecules, peptides and proteins , 1999, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.
[55] Simona Distinto,et al. Evaluation of the performance of 3D virtual screening protocols: RMSD comparisons, enrichment assessments, and decoy selection—What can we learn from earlier mistakes? , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[56] A Srinivas Reddy,et al. Virtual screening in drug discovery -- a computational perspective. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.
[57] D. Schomburg,et al. Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[58] Paul W Finn,et al. Ultrafast shape recognition: evaluating a new ligand-based virtual screening technology. , 2009, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[59] Pierre Baldi,et al. Mathematical Correction for Fingerprint Similarity Measures to Improve Chemical Retrieval , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[60] Woody Sherman,et al. Rapid Shape-Based Ligand Alignment and Virtual Screening Method Based on Atom/Feature-Pair Similarities and Volume Overlap Scoring , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..