Externalities of openness in innovation

Discussion of open innovation has typically stressed the benefits to the individual enterprise from boundary-spanning linkages and improved internal knowledge sharing. In this paper we explore the potential for wider benefits from openness in innovation and argue that openness may itself generate positive externalities by enabling improved knowledge diffusion. The potential for these (positive) externalities suggests a divergence between the private and social returns to openness and the potential for a sub-optimal level of openness where this is determined purely by firms’ private returns. Our analysis is based on Irish plant-level panel data from manufacturing industry over the period 1994–2008. Based on instrumental variables regression models our results suggest that externalities of openness in innovation are significant and that they are positively associated with firms’ innovation performance. We find that these externality effects are unlikely to work through their effect on the spread of open innovation practices. Instead, they appear to positively influence innovation outputs by either increasing knowledge diffusion or strengthening competition. Our evidence on the significance of externalities from openness in innovation provides a rationale for public policy aimed at promoting open innovation practices among firms.

[1]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Openness and Innovation Performance: Are Small Firms Different? , 2014 .

[2]  D. Greenaway,et al.  Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[3]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning, Innovation, and Innovation Policy , 2007 .

[4]  H. Ernst,et al.  Opening Up the Innovation Process: The Role of Technology Aggressiveness , 2009 .

[5]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries , 2010 .

[6]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry , 2005 .

[7]  Mario Cannataro,et al.  Protein-to-protein interactions: Technologies, databases, and algorithms , 2010, CSUR.

[8]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[9]  P. Geroski.  What do we know about entry , 1995 .

[10]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[11]  Priit Vahter.  Does FDI Spur Productivity, Knowledge Sourcing and Innovation by Incumbent Firms? Evidence from Manufacturing Industry in Estonia , 2011 .

[12]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  B. Javorcik.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages , 2002 .

[15]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  The Effects of Entry on Incumbent Innovation and Productivity , 2005, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[16]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation , 2006 .

[17]  Bettina Peters,et al.  Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries , 2006 .

[18]  George L. Kovács,et al.  Ambient Intelligence in Product Life-cycle Management , 2006, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[19]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[20]  R. Lund.  Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg , 2006 .

[21]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[22]  J. Vickers.  Concepts of Competition , 1995 .

[23]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Productivity Growth, Knowledge Flows, and Spillovers , 2007 .

[24]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Research Investment, Innovation and Productivity: An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[25]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data , 2001 .

[26]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[27]  S. Majd.  Bureau of Economic Research. , 1985 .

[28]  Toshihiro Kodama,et al.  The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan , 2008 .

[29]  Hans Lööf,et al.  Multinational enterprises and innovation: firm level evidence on spillover via R&D collaboration , 2009 .

[30]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[31]  S. Roper,et al.  Output Additionality of Public Support for Innovation: Evidence for Irish Manufacturing Plants , 2010 .

[32]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and Growth: Reconciling Theory and Evidence , 2005 .

[33]  A. Venables,et al.  BUZZ : THE ECONOMIC FORCE OF THE CITY , 2002 .

[34]  Gregory Tassey,et al.  The disaggregated technology production function: A new model of university and corporate research , 2005 .

[35]  P. Aghion,et al.  Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[36]  J. Angrist.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2008 .

[37]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[38]  V.V.N. Kishore,et al.  A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technologies , 2010 .

[39]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Learning from Open Innovation , 2011 .

[40]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. , 1996 .

[41]  Spillovers of Innovation Activities and Their Profitability , 2007 .

[42]  Shahid Yusuf.  Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses , 2008 .

[43]  Kornelius Kraft,et al.  Do Spillovers Stimulate Incremental or Drastic Product Innovations? Evidence from German Establishment Data , 2011 .

[44]  Donald W. K. Andrews,et al.  Identification and Inference for Econometric Models , 2005 .

[45]  T. Klette,et al.  Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-so-Fixed Effect Model , 1998 .

[46]  D. Faems,et al.  Book review: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm / by H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West. - Oxford University Press. - ISBN 978-0-19929072-7 , 2008 .

[47]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[48]  M. Hosein Fallah,et al.  Localized Sources of Knowledge and the Effect of Knowledge Spillovers: An Empirical Study of Inventors in the Telecommunications Industry , 2008 .

[49]  A. Venables,et al.  Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy , 2004 .

[50]  D. Czarnitzki,et al.  Spillovers of Innovation Activities and Their Profitability , 2012 .

[51]  J. West,et al.  Open innovation : researching a new paradigm , 2008 .

[52]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[53]  Hurvey Leibenstein.  Allocative efficiency vs. X-Efficiency , 1966 .

[54]  E. B. Acworth,et al.  University–industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute , 2008 .

[55]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[56]  S. Orr,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technology adoption—the German experience , 2005 .

[57]  Ann E. Harrison,et al.  Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela , 1999 .

[58]  M. Freel,et al.  Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms , 2005 .

[59]  Fariba Sadri,et al.  Ambient intelligence: A survey , 2011, CSUR.

[60]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[61]  S. Breschi,et al.  Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows , 2009 .

[62]  B. Javorcik.  Can survey evidence shed light on spillovers from foreign direct investment , 2008 .

[63]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[64]  Leon A.G. Oerlemans,et al.  Do networks matter for innovation? The usefulness of the network approach in analysing innovation , 1998 .

[65]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .