Development of policies for Natura 2000 sites: a multi-criteria approach to support decision makers.

The aim of this study is to present a methodology to support decision makers in the choice of Natura 2000 sites needing an appropriate management plan to ensure a sustainable socio-economic development. In order to promote sustainable development in the Natura 2000 sites compatible with nature preservation, conservation measures or management plans are necessary. The main issue is to decide when only conservation measures can be applied and when the sites need an appropriate management plan. We present a case study for the Italian Region of Umbria. The methodology is based on a multi-criteria approach to identify the biodiversity index (BI), and on the development of a human activities index (HAI). By crossing the two indexes for each site on a Cartesian plane, four groups of sites were identified. Each group corresponds to a specific need for an appropriate management plan. Sites in the first group with a high level both of biodiversity and human activities have the most urgent need of an appropriate management plan to ensure sustainable development. The proposed methodology and analysis is replicable in other regions or countries by using the data available for each site in the Natura 2000 standard data form. A multi-criteria analysis is especially suitable for supporting decision makers when they deal with a multidimensional decision process. We found the multi-criteria approach particularly sound in this case, due to the concept of biodiversity itself, which is complex and multidimensional, and to the high number of alternatives (Natura 2000 sites) to be assessed.

[1]  Bernard Fisher,et al.  Fuzzy approaches to environmental decisions: application to air quality , 2006 .

[2]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[3]  Adiel Teixeira de Almeida,et al.  Water supply system decision making using multicriteria analysis , 2007 .

[4]  M. Strager,et al.  Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA , 2006 .

[5]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A comparison of multiple criteria analysis and unaided approaches to environmental decision making , 2007 .

[6]  Antonio Boggia,et al.  Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Elgin Perry,et al.  A retrospective evaluation of 316(b) mitigation options using a decision analysis framework , 2000 .

[8]  K. Redford,et al.  Diversity and homogenization in the endgame , 2006 .

[9]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Raoul Beunen,et al.  The governance of Natura 2000 sites: the importance of initial choices in the organisation of planning processes , 2011 .

[11]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Identification of top priority areas and management landscapes from a national Natura 2000 network , 2013 .

[12]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[13]  B. Roy Paradigms and Challenges , 2005 .

[14]  Simon French,et al.  The varied contexts of environmental decision problems and their implications for decision support , 2005 .

[15]  C. Romão,et al.  Interpretation manual of European Union habitats. , 1996 .

[16]  Carly McLachlan,et al.  Trade-offs in assessing different energy futures: a regional multi-criteria assessment of the role of carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2006 .

[17]  Ron Janssen Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Management , 1992 .

[18]  Felix Rauschmayer,et al.  Participation in EU Biodiversity Governance: How Far beyond Rhetoric? , 2009 .

[19]  Paul Opdam,et al.  Enhancing biodiversity at business sites: What are the options, and which of these do stakeholders prefer? , 2009 .