Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles.

The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and mechanism of gene transfection by ultrasound (US) destruction of plasmid-bearing microbubbles. Luciferase reporter plasmid was charge-coupled to cationic lipid microbubbles. Rat hindlimb skeletal muscle was exposed to intermittent high-power US during dose-adjusted intra-arterial (IA) or IV administration of plasmid-bearing microbubbles via the carotid artery or jugular vein, respectively. At 4 days, luciferase activity in US-exposed skeletal muscle was 200-fold greater with IA than with IV administration of plasmid-bearing microbubbles, and was similar to transfection achieved by IM injection of plasmid (positive control). No transfection occurred with US and IA injection of plasmid alone. Intravital microscopy of the cremaster muscle in mice following administration of microbubbles and US exposure demonstrated perivascular deposition of fluorescent plasmid, the extent of which was twofold greater for IA compared to IV injection. Electron microscopy demonstrated a greater extent of myocellular microporations in US-exposed muscle after IA injection of microbubbles. We conclude that muscle transfection by US destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles is amplified by IA, rather than IV, injection of microbubbles due to greater extravascular deposition of plasmid and to greater extent of myocellular microporation.

[1]  P. Iversen,et al.  Inhibition of carotid artery neointimal formation with intravenous microbubbles. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[3]  F. Ledley Nonviral gene therapy: the promise of genes as pharmaceutical products. , 1995, Human gene therapy.

[4]  Ryuichi Morishita,et al.  Local Delivery of Plasmid DNA Into Rat Carotid Artery Using Ultrasound , 2002, Circulation.

[5]  S. Ylä-Herttuala,et al.  Cardiovascular gene therapy , 2000, The Lancet.

[6]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Microvascular rheology of Definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[7]  D. Miller,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Activation of Contrast Agent Gas Bodies Induces Capillary Rupture in Mice. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transfection of mammalian cells. , 1996, Human gene therapy.

[9]  Arthur C. Guyton,et al.  Handbook of Physiology—The Cardiovascular System , 1985 .

[10]  Zheng Ma,et al.  Nonviral gene therapy. , 2001, Current gene therapy.

[11]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transfection of canine myocardium by intravenous administration of cationic microbubble-linked plasmid DNA. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[12]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[13]  F. Champlin,et al.  Status of methods for assessing bacterial cell surface charge properties based on zeta potential measurements. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[14]  L. Leinwand,et al.  Hormonal modulation of a gene injected into rat heart in vivo. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Zimmer,et al.  Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Ji Song,et al.  Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  J. Morris,et al.  Sonoporation of cultured cells in the rotating tube exposure system. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  S. Bolling,et al.  Expression of recombinant genes in myocardium in vivo after direct injection of DNA. , 1990, Circulation.

[20]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[21]  M. Boegehold,et al.  Peripheral vascular resistance and regional blood flows in hypertensive Dahl rats. , 1991, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  S. Kaul,et al.  Microbubble persistence in the microcirculation during ischemia/reperfusion and inflammation is caused by integrin- and complement-mediated adherence to activated leukocytes. , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  Y. Taniyama,et al.  Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle , 2002, Gene Therapy.

[24]  P. Dayton,et al.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  J F Greenleaf,et al.  Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[26]  J. Ruysschaert,et al.  A novel cationic amphiphile for transfection of mammalian cells. , 1994, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.