Integrated local correlation: A new measure of local coherence in fMRI data

This article introduces the measure of integrated local correlation (ILC) for assessing local coherence in the brain using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and characterizes the measure in terms of reproducibility, the effect of physiological noise, and the dependence on image resolution. The coupling of local neuronal processes influences coherence in a voxel's neighborhood. ILC is defined, for each voxel, as the integration of its spatial correlation function. This integrated measure does not require the specification of a neighborhood and, as demonstrated by experimental data, is effectively independent of image resolution. Respiratory and cardiac fluctuations do not considerably alter the ILC value except in isolated areas in and surrounding large vessels. With resting‐state fMRI data, ILC was demonstrated to be tissue‐specific, higher in gray matter than white matter, and reproducible across consecutive runs in healthy individuals. Within the gray matter, ILC was found to be higher in the default mode network, particularly the posterior and anterior cingulate cortices. Comparing ILC maps obtained from resting state and continuous motor task data, we observed reduced local coherence in the default mode network during the task. Finally, we compared ILC and regional homogeneity by examining their ability to discriminate between gray and white matters in resting state data and found ILC to be more sensitive. Hum Brain Mapp 2009. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  V. Haughton,et al.  Mapping functionally related regions of brain with functional connectivity MR imaging. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[4]  P. Fransson Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[5]  R Baumgartner,et al.  Assessment of cluster homogeneity in fMRI data using Kendall's coefficient of concordance. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Victoria L Morgan,et al.  The effect of sensorimotor activation on functional connectivity mapping with MRI. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals , 1980 .

[12]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  S. J. Peltier,et al.  T2 * Dependence of Low Frequency Functional Connectivity , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[16]  Gaohong Wu,et al.  Alzheimer Disease: evaluation of a functional MR imaging index as a marker. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  Scott Peltier,et al.  Tissue specificity of nonlinear dynamics in baseline fMRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Yingli Lu,et al.  Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[19]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[20]  Habib Benali,et al.  Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[22]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Detecting Functional Connectivity of the Cerebellum Using Low Frequency Fluctuations (LFFs) , 2004, MICCAI.

[23]  M. Lowe,et al.  Functional Connectivity in Single and Multislice Echoplanar Imaging Using Resting-State Fluctuations , 1998, NeuroImage.

[24]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[25]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Activation pattern reproducibility: Measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[26]  B. Biswal,et al.  Simultaneous assessment of flow and BOLD signals in resting‐state functional connectivity maps , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[28]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.