Incremental learning of sequence patterns with a modular network model

The relationship between generalization and differentiation fluctuates depending on the ongoing context, which is extracted by the current adaptive capability of the learner. In the present report, we numerically examine the relationship between generalization and differentiation using a novel connectionist model. The simulation results of incremental learning indicate that the newly added sequence modifies the previously learned internal representations in a different manner, depending on the inconsistency with the preceding task. This observation supports our assertion that it is fundamentally important to investigate how the transition dynamics of learning toward a goal affects the finally acquired structure of the learner.

[1]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[3]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[4]  Jun Tani,et al.  Self-organization of behavioral primitives as multiple attractor dynamics: A robot experiment , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[5]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Development as a dynamic system , 1992, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Jun Tani,et al.  Learning Semantic Combinatoriality from the Interaction between Linguistic and Behavioral Processes , 2005, Adapt. Behav..

[7]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning , 1997, Nature.

[8]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation Systems for Autonomous Mental Development , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[9]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[10]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts , 1991, Neural Computation.

[11]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[12]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  Maximizing Learning Progress: An Internal Reward System for Development , 2003, Embodied Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  Y. Dudai The neurobiology of consolidations, or, how stable is the engram? , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1993, Neural Computation.

[15]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Neural learning of embodied interaction dynamics , 1998, Neural Networks.

[16]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Emergence and Categorization of Coordinated Visual Behavior Through Embodied Interaction , 1998, Machine Learning.

[18]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems , 1998, Neural Networks.

[19]  James L. McClelland,et al.  James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987. , 1989, Journal of Child Language.