An Efficient Bi-Level Surrogate Approach for Optimizing Shock Control Bumps under Uncertainty

The assessment of uncertainties is essential in aerodynamic shape optimization problems in order to come up with configurations that are more robust. The influence of aleatory fluctuations in flight conditions and manufacturing tolerances is of primary concern when designing shock control bumps, as their effectiveness is highly sensitive to the shock wave location. However, exploring the stochastic design space for the global robust optimum increases the computational cost, especially when dealing with nonconvex design spaces and multiple local optima. The aim of this paper is to develop a framework for efficient aerodynamic shape optimization under uncertainty by means of a bi-level surrogate approach and to apply it to the robust design of a retrofitted shock control bump over an airfoil. The framework combines a surrogate-based optimization algorithm with an efficient surrogate-based approach for uncertainty quantification. The surrogate-based optimizer efficiently finds the global optimum of a given quantile of the drag coefficient. It outperforms traditional evolutionary algorithms by effectively balancing exploration and exploitation through the combination of adaptive sampling and a moving trust region. At each iteration of the optimization, the surrogate-based uncertainty quantification uses an active infill criterion in order to accurately quantify the quantile of the drag at a reduced number of function evaluations. Two different quantiles of the drag are chosen, the 95% to increase the robustness at off-design conditions, and the 50% for a configuration that is best for day to day operations. In both cases, the optimum configurations lead to an airfoil that is more robust to geometrical and operational uncertainties, compared to the configuration obtained through classical deterministic optimization.

[1]  A. W. van der Vaart,et al.  Uniform Central Limit Theorems , 2001 .

[2]  Volker Schulz,et al.  Optimal Aerodynamic Design under Uncertainty , 2013 .

[3]  Jens Neumann,et al.  The Parallel Mesh Deformation of the DLR TAU-Code , 2007 .

[4]  Egon Stanewsky,et al.  Synopsis of the Project EUROSHOCK II , 2002 .

[5]  Colas Schretter,et al.  Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods , 2016 .

[6]  I. Sobol On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals , 1967 .

[7]  Peiqing Liu,et al.  Shock control bump parametric research on supercritical airfoil , 2011 .

[8]  Caslav Ilic,et al.  Surrogate-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of a Wing-Body Transport Aircraft Configuration , 2015 .

[9]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Efficient Quantification of Aerodynamic Uncertainty due to Random Geometry Perturbations , 2014 .

[10]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization , 2009 .

[11]  Roland Schöbi,et al.  Surrogate models for uncertainty quantification in the context of imprecise probability modelling , 2017 .

[12]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[13]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Active transonic aerofoil design optimization usingrobust multiobjective evolutionary algorithms , 2011 .

[14]  Edward Jinks Adaptive shock control bumps , 2014 .

[15]  T. Yun,et al.  Shock control bump parametric research on supercritical airfoil , 2011 .

[16]  T. Lutz,et al.  Shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control using three-dimensional bumps for transonic wings , 2007 .

[17]  Giovanni Petrone,et al.  Optimization Under Uncertainty Using the Generalized Inverse Distribution Function , 2014, Modeling, Simulation and Optimization for Science and Technology.

[18]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Exploring multi-dimensional spaces: a Comparison of Latin Hypercube and Quasi Monte Carlo Sampling Techniques , 2015, 1505.02350.

[19]  T. Lutz,et al.  Numerical Optimization of Finite Shock Control Bumps , 2006 .

[20]  Soshi Kawai,et al.  Kriging-model-based uncertainty quantification in computational fluid dynamics , 2014 .

[21]  M. Werner Application of an Adaptive Shock Control Bump for Drag Reduction on a Variable Camber NLF Wing , 2018 .

[22]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  Improving variable-fidelity surrogate modeling via gradient-enhanced kriging and a generalized hybrid bridge function , 2013 .

[23]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[24]  Nicolas Gayton,et al.  AK-MCS: An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo Simulation , 2011 .

[25]  N. M. Alexandrov,et al.  A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization , 1997 .

[26]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[27]  Ling Li,et al.  Sequential design of computer experiments for the estimation of a probability of failure , 2010, Statistics and Computing.

[28]  H. Babinsky,et al.  Experimental study into the flow physics of three-dimensional shock control bumps , 2012 .

[29]  Thomas Gerhold,et al.  Overview of the Hybrid RANS Code TAU , 2005 .

[30]  Régis Duvigneau Aerodynamic Shape Optimization with Uncertain Operating Conditions using Metamodels , 2007 .

[31]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[32]  Ewald Krämer,et al.  Shock control bump robustness enhancement , 2012 .

[33]  Michael Meinel,et al.  The FlowSimulator framework for massively parallel CFD applications , 2010 .

[34]  T. Rowan Functional stability analysis of numerical algorithms , 1990 .

[35]  Stefan Görtz,et al.  AN EFFICIENT AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK FOR ROBUST DESIGN OF AIRFOILS USING SURROGATE MODELS , 2016 .

[36]  Ke Zhao,et al.  Robust design of NLF airfoils , 2013 .

[37]  P. Bruce,et al.  Review of research into shock control bumps , 2015 .

[38]  Jerome Sacks,et al.  Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide , 2009, Technometrics.

[39]  K. Mazaheri,et al.  The Multi-point Optimization of Shock Control Bump with Constant-Lift Constraint Enhanced with Suction and Blowing for a Supercritical Airfoil , 2016 .

[40]  Ralf Zimmermann,et al.  Asymptotic Behavior of the Likelihood Function of Covariance Matrices of Spatial Gaussian Processes , 2010, J. Appl. Math..