Mid-pregnancy cervical length as a risk factor for cesarean section in women with twin pregnancies

Abstract Objective: It is well known that a short cervix at mid-pregnancy is a risk factor for spontaneous preterm birth in both singleton and twin gestations. Recent evidence also suggests that a long cervix at mid-pregnancy is a predictor of the risk of cesarean section (C/S) in singleton gestation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a long cervix at mid-pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of C/S in women with twin pregnancies. Methods: We enrolled 746 women pregnant with twins whose cervical length was measured by trans-vaginal ultrasonography at a mean of 22 weeks of gestation and who delivered in our institution. Cases with a short cervix [cervical length (CL) <15 mm] were excluded. Cases were divided into four groups according to the quartile of CL. Results: The rate of C/S increased according to the quartile of CL (47% in the 1st quartile, 51% in the 2nd quartile, 56% in the 3rd quartile and 62% in the 4th quartile, P<0.005, χ2 for trend). CL was an independent risk factor for C/S even after adjustment for confounding variables. When confining analysis to women who delivered after a trial of labor (n=418), to nulliparous women (n=633) or to those who delivered at late preterm or full term (n=666), the rate of C/S also increased according to the quartile of CL, and the relationship between CL and the risk of C/S remained significant after adjustment in each group. Conclusion: In women pregnant with twins, long CL at mid-pregnancy was a risk factor for C/S.

[1]  H. Scheepers,et al.  Second‐trimester cervical length as risk indicator for Cesarean delivery in women with twin pregnancy , 2015, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[2]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Midpregnancy Cervical Length in Nulliparous Women and its Association with Postterm Delivery and Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery , 2015, American Journal of Perinatology.

[3]  S. Chung,et al.  Sonographically accessed funneling of the uterine cervix as a predictor of successful labor induction , 2015, Obstetrics & gynecology science.

[4]  B. Mol,et al.  Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial , 2013, The Lancet.

[5]  E. Miller,et al.  Association Between Second-Trimester Cervical Length and Primary Cesarean Delivery , 2013, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  Gynecologists Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Iams,et al.  Is sonographic assessment of the cervix necessary and helpful? , 2012, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prevention of preterm delivery in twin gestations (PREDICT): a multicenter, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial on the effect of vaginal micronized progesterone , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  Michael House,et al.  Changes in the biochemical constituents and morphologic appearance of the human cervical stroma during pregnancy. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[10]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Cervical length at mid-pregnancy and the risk of primary cesarean delivery. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Progesterone and the risk of preterm birth among women with a short cervix. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  T. Leung,et al.  Cervical length at 18–22 weeks of gestation for prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery in Hong Kong Chinese women , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Ultrasound examination at 37 weeks' gestation in the prediction of pregnancy outcome: the value of cervical assessment , 2003, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[14]  Acog ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: Dystocia and augmentation of labor. , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[15]  F. Chalot,et al.  Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction , 2002, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[17]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Prediction of preterm delivery in twins by cervical assessment at 23 weeks , 2001, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[18]  B. Raynor,et al.  Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[19]  B. Leighton,et al.  Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin gestations near term. , 1999, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  K. Nicolaides,et al.  Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[21]  G. Saade,et al.  Control and assessment of the uterus and cervix during pregnancy and labour. , 1998, Human reproduction update.

[22]  B. Blondel,et al.  [The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery]. , 1996, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[23]  R. Garfield,et al.  Antiprogestins in the Induction of Labor , 1994, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[24]  D. Firth Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates , 1993 .

[25]  A. Rebarber,et al.  Risk factors for cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  J. O'Brien 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for the prevention of adverse neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. , 2012, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  E. Norwitz Cervical length changes during preterm cervical ripening: effects of 17-α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate , 2008 .

[28]  Yallampalli Chandra,et al.  Control of Myometrial Contractility and Labor , 1994 .

[29]  CLINICAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR OBSTETRICIAN – GYNECOLOGISTS , 2022 .