Evaluating the scavenging process by the scavenging curve of an opposed-piston, two-stroke (OP2S) diesel engine

Abstract Due to its inherent advantages of superior manufacturability, power density, and thermal efficiency, the opposed-piston, two-stroke (OP2S) diesel engine has great potential in alleviating energy consumption and improving fuel economy. The scavenging process is the key factor affecting the performance of OP2S diesel engines; however, because there are many evaluation parameters for the scavenging process, there are also many difficulties in matching and optimizing the scavenging system. To bridge this knowledge gap, this study established a three-dimensional model of an OP2S diesel engine to optimize the port height by the scavenging curve. The model was verified and validated through a steady flow experiment. The scavenging performance indicators, including distribution of residual gas, scavenging efficiency, trapping efficiency, and delivery ratio, were investigated under different port heights. The scavenging model method and the scavenging curve method were employed to evaluate the scavenging process. The results show that, when analyzing the factors that affect scavenging performance, the scavenging curve can be used to evaluate not only the optimization potential of the scavenging system but also the development of the scavenging process. After optimizing the port height by the scavenging curve, the actual scavenging curve appeared in the zone enveloped by the scavenging curve of the maximum port (34 mm/34 mm) and the scavenging curve of the minimum port (12 mm/14 mm). In this greater zone, there is a preferred zone where the port height to stroke ratio is from 0.11 to 0.15, which is the optimal value. This study reveals the influence of different port heights on scavenging performance and provides design insights for evaluating and optimizing the scavenging process of an OP2S diesel engine.

[1]  M. Huo,et al.  Piston Design Impact on the Scavenging and Combustion in an Opposed-Piston, Opposed-Cylinder (OPOC) Two-Stroke Engine , 2015 .

[2]  Marek Tatur,et al.  Opposed Piston Opposed Cylinder (opoc™) 5/10 kW Heavy Fuel Engine for UAVs and APUs , 2006 .

[3]  Horst E. Friedrich,et al.  Development and Experimental Investigation of a Two-Stroke Opposed-Piston Free-Piston Engine , 2016 .

[4]  Massimo Borghi,et al.  Design and experimental development of a compact and efficient range extender engine , 2017 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Pirault,et al.  Opposed Piston Engines: Evolution, Use, and Future Applications , 2009 .

[6]  Michael H. Wahl,et al.  Oil Consumption Measurements for a Modern Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Diesel Engine , 2011 .

[7]  Changlu Zhao,et al.  Effects of Scavenging System Configuration on In-Cylinder Air Flow Organization of an Opposed-Piston Two-Stroke Engine , 2015 .

[8]  N. Abani,et al.  Developing a 55% BTE Commercial Heavy-Duty Opposed-Piston Engine without a Waste Heat Recovery System , 2017 .

[9]  Yuhang Liu,et al.  Study on the synthetic scavenging model validation method of opposed-piston two-stroke diesel engine , 2016 .

[10]  Hao Wang,et al.  An Experimental Investigation on the Combustion and Heat Release Characteristics of an Opposed-Piston Folded-Cranktrain Diesel Engine , 2015 .

[11]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Meeting Stringent 2025 Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Regulations with an Opposed-Piston, Light-Duty Diesel Engine , 2014 .

[12]  Michael H. Wahl,et al.  Cylinder Cooling for Improved Durability on an Opposed-Piston Engine , 2012 .

[13]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Thermodynamic Benefits of Opposed-Piston Two- Stroke Engines , 2011 .

[14]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[16]  Gerhard Regner,et al.  Modernizing the Opposed-Piston, Two-Stroke Engine for Clean, Efficient Transportation , 2013 .