Design of a Compressive Remote Imaging System Compensating a Highly Lightweight Encoding with a Refined Decoding Scheme

Lightweight remote imaging systems have been increasingly used in surveillance and reconnaissance. Nevertheless, the limited power, processing and bandwidth resources is a major issue for the existing solutions, not well addressed by the standard video compression techniques. On the one hand, the MPEGx family achieves a balance between the reconstruction quality and the required bit-rate by exploiting potential intraand interframe redundancies at the encoder, but at the cost of increased memory and processing demands. On the other hand, the M-JPEG approach consists of a computationally efficient encoding process, with the drawback of resulting in much higher bit-rates. In this paper, we cope with the growing compression ratios, required for all remote imaging applications, by exploiting the inherent property of compressive sensing (CS), acting simultaneously as a sensing and compression framework. The proposed compressive video sensing (CVS) system incorporates the advantages of a very simple CS-based encoding process, while putting the main computational burden at the decoder combining the efficiency of a motion compensation procedure for the extraction of inter-frame correlations, along with an additional super-resolution step to enhance the quality of reconstructed frames. The experimental results reveal a significant improvement of the reconstruction quality when compared with M-JPEG, at equal or even lower bit-rates.

[1]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Efficient sparse representation based image super resolution via dual dictionary learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[2]  Peng Wang,et al.  Super Resolution Reconstruction via Multiple Frames Joint Learning , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Multimedia and Signal Processing.

[3]  S. O. Aase,et al.  IMPROVED HUFFMAN CODING USING RECURSIVE SPLITTING , 2000 .

[4]  Chun-Shien Lu,et al.  Distributed compressive video sensing , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[5]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Fast compressive sampling with structurally random matrices , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[6]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Motion estimated and compensated compressed sensing dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: What we can learn from video compression techniques , 2010 .

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Distributed Compressed Video Sensing , 2009, 2009 43rd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[9]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Example-Based Super-Resolution , 2002, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[10]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image super-resolution as sparse representation of raw image patches , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Samuel Cheng,et al.  Compressive video sampling , 2008, 2008 16th European Signal Processing Conference.

[12]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Distributed Video Coding using Compressive Sampling , 2009, 2009 Picture Coding Symposium.

[13]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[14]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Iterative Hard Thresholding for Compressed Sensing , 2008, ArXiv.