Possibilities and limitations of innovative retrofitting for masonry churches: Advanced computations on three case studies

Abstract The use of fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) represents an interesting option to inhibit the formation of partial collapse mechanisms on macro-blocks, which is a typical failure mode shown by masonry churches under seismic actions. Furthermore, FRP strips exhibit a very good performance at failure, low invasiveness and high speed of execution. This study provides an insight into the possible applications of FRP on three masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia seismic sequence. Several different linear and non-linear analyses are carried out, including standard response spectrum analyses, limit analyses with both pre-assigned failure mechanisms and Finite Elements (FE), pushover and non-linear dynamic analyses. A remarkable consistency is found between the real seismic performance of the churches and the results obtained through both limit and advanced non-linear dynamic analyses. In particular, both the damage distributions and the active failure mechanisms derived from the numerical analyses are consistent with those observed on the churches after the seismic event. A seismic upgrading of the churches through the application of FRP is proposed, using a proper design procedure based on comprehensive advanced FE computations, with the aim of obtaining the required seismic performance and limited invasiveness. The interaction between FRP strips and masonry substrate is accounted for assuming the FRP behavior in agreement with Italian Guidelines for strengthening with composite materials (CNR DT200). It is found that through a rational design procedure of the FRP strengthening intervention it is possible to prevent the premature collapse of the macro-elements, considerably increasing their load carrying capacity.

[1]  M. Corradi,et al.  Strengthening techniques tested on masonry structures struck by the Umbria-Marche earthquake of 1997-1998 , 2002 .

[2]  Oskar Larsson Ivanov,et al.  Clay brick masonry facades with cracks caused by corroding bed joint reinforcement – Findings from field survey and laboratory study , 2016 .

[3]  Nicola Cavalagli,et al.  Dome of the Basilica of Santa Maria Degli Angeli in Assisi: Static and Dynamic Assessment , 2015 .

[4]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Safety Assessment of Four Masonry Churches by a Plate and Shell FE Nonlinear Approach , 2013 .

[5]  Andrea Vignoli,et al.  Numerical assessment of the static and seismic behaviour of the basilica of Santa Maria all’Impruneta (Italy) , 2011 .

[6]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM , 2016 .

[7]  Giuliano Augusti,et al.  Seismic vulnerability of monumental buildings , 2001 .

[8]  Luigi Sorrentino,et al.  The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[9]  Fabrizio Vestroni,et al.  Field observations and failure analysis of the Basilica S. Maria di Collemaggio after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2013 .

[10]  Marco Valente,et al.  Damage assessment of three medieval churches after the 2012 Emilia earthquake , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  F. Focacci,et al.  FRP-masonry interfacial debonding: An energy balance approach to determine the influence of the mortar joints , 2016 .

[12]  Antonio Borri,et al.  Retrofit and monitoring of an historical building using “Smart” CFRP with embedded fibre optic Brillouin sensors , 2005 .

[13]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  On the vulnerability assessment of monumental buildings , 2006 .

[14]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Modelling and analysis of FRP-strengthened masonry panels , 2008 .

[15]  Michele Betti,et al.  Modelling and analysis of a Romanesque church under earthquake loading: Assessment of seismic resistance , 2008 .

[16]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: Possibilities of non-linear finite elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms , 2015 .

[17]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Closed form solution for predicting the horizontal capacity of masonry portal frames through limit analysis and comparison with experimental test results , 2015 .

[18]  K. H. Lee,et al.  Relationships between bending solutions of Reissner and Mindlin plate theories , 2001 .

[19]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Failure analysis of seven masonry churches severely damaged during the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) earthquake: Non-linear dynamic analyses vs conventional static approaches , 2015 .

[20]  P. Lourenço,et al.  Numerical analysis of bond behavior between masonry bricks and composite materials , 2012 .

[21]  F. Vecchio,et al.  THE MODIFIED COMPRESSION FIELD THEORY FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE ELEMENTS SUBJECTED TO SHEAR , 1986 .

[22]  Gianfranco De Matteis,et al.  Damage Probability Matrices for Three-Nave Masonry Churches in Abruzzi After the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake , 2015 .

[23]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Automatic fragility curve evaluation of masonry churches accounting for partial collapses by means of 3D FE homogenized limit analysis , 2011 .

[24]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Homogenised limit analysis of masonry walls, Part II: Structural examples , 2006 .

[25]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling , 2016 .

[26]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Lesson learned after the Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 20–29 May 2012 earthquakes: A limit analysis insight on three masonry churches , 2013 .

[27]  Antonio Formisano,et al.  Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building , 2017 .

[28]  D. Pecknold,et al.  INELASTIC MODEL FOR CYCLIC BIAXIAL LOADING OF REINFORCED CONCRETE , 1974 .

[29]  Paulo B. Lourenço ASSESSMENT, DIAGNOSIS AND STRENGTHENING OF OUTEIRO CHURCH, PORTUGAL , 2005 .

[30]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Role of inclination in the seismic vulnerability of bell towers: FE models and simplified approaches , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[31]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake , 2013 .

[32]  R. Capozucca Experimental FRP/SRP–historic masonry delamination , 2010 .

[33]  F. Ascione The influence of adhesion defects on the collapse of FRP adhesive joints , 2016 .

[34]  Luigi Fregonese,et al.  An insight in the late Baroque architecture: An integrated approach for a unique Bibiena church , 2017 .

[35]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  A numerical insight into the response of masonry reinforced by FRP strips. The case of perfect adhesion , 2010 .

[36]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North-East of Italy , 2016 .

[37]  A. Borri,et al.  Retrofitting of masonry building with reinforced masonry ring-beam , 2009 .

[38]  Gabriele Milani,et al.  3D homogenized limit analysis of masonry buildings under horizontal loads , 2007 .

[39]  Stefano Lenci,et al.  Seismic behavior of an Italian Renaissance Sanctuary: Damage assessment by numerical modelling , 2016 .

[40]  R. Capozucca,et al.  Bond of GFRP strips on modern and historic brickwork masonry , 2016 .