Adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer.

Breast cancer-specific mortality has declined over the last two decades as a result of the introduction of screening programmes and advances in adjuvant systemic therapy. The most notable progress has been achieved in the case of Her2-positive disease, following the introduction of trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the extracellular domain ofHer2. Indeed, addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy for a total duration of 1 year increases progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy alone. In hormone receptor-positive disease, treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) prolongs PFS compared with tamoxifen, and in some clinical trials they have been found to increase OS also. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with triple-negative disease and also plays a role in Her2-positive and high-risk hormone receptor-positive tumours. Although, overall, only limited progress has been achieved in this field, most trials suggest that the introduction of taxanes has resulted in improved outcomes. Dose-dense chemotherapy is superior to older adjuvant regimens comprising 3-weekly administration of paclitaxel, while high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support currently has no place in the treatment of breast cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases the rate of breast-conserving surgeries; importantly, the pathological complete remission (pCR) rate has been identified as a surrogate for improved OS in hormone receptor-negative patients. Thus, clinical trials have aimed to increase pCR rates by addition of further cytotoxic substances or biologicals such as trastuzumab, lapatinib or bevacizumab. However, the optimum treatment strategy for hormone receptor-negative patients without pCR remains elusive. This review discusses recent developments and open questions in the field of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer.

[1]  R. Coombes,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of tamoxifen vs surgery in elderly patients with breast cancer. , 1994, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[2]  A. Howell,et al.  Investigation of a new pure antiestrogen (ICI 182780) in women with primary breast cancer. , 1994, Cancer research.

[3]  B. Teicher,et al.  A phase II study of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with autologous marrow support in women with measurable advanced breast cancer responding to standard-dose therapy. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowe , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  R. Donehower,et al.  Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  C R King,et al.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project: prognostic significance of erbB-2 protein overexpression in primary breast cancer. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[8]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Dose-response effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.